saintwarwick

You offer an opinion on a game you did not see, 15saints gave you an opinion on a game he/she did see, that's the difference so his/her "informed" position is a lot more accurate than your bolllocks.

We didn't start so utterly shiiite we started the better team, it wasn't until the first Wolves attack that they scored and by the time we got a goal back midway through the first half the players spirits were lifted. As for Euell he didn't make a mistake through pressure but went 50/50 with a wolves player. The fact that the wolves player feigned injury says a lot about the decision. Still you have to be there to witness these incidents.

Agreed Cork was rubbish today at defending, a bit better going forward although his reading of the ball was lost sometimes. McGoldrick needs a partner up front, he cannot play on his own and we need to play 4 4 2 at home.

Excellent summary of the game. We started of well until they scored their first goal then the defence was at sixes and sevens, you just knew they would score on their next attack and thay did. Getting a goal back just after they scored their second lifted the players spirits and we had a couple more efforts before Euell was sent off. Second half saw a great fightback by the saints and although we had few chances (hitting the post, couple of saves by their goalie and a missed open goal) Wolves looked like they could score as well.The ref was diabolical imo. Two penalties missed by the ref (a McGoldrick foul and a handball), Euell sent of when it looked like a fifty fifty tackle, a foul on the edge of the Wolves box which the ref waved play on, only for our player to then foul a Wolves player for a free kick to Wolves. The ref then booked the Wolves player who fouled our player just a few seconds earlier clearly pointing to the spot where it was committed. Now I can only assume he played advantage to us from that foul, an advantage we clearly did not have. Great support by the crowd especially the northam, Wolves fans very quiet considering they are top and were winning.

They paid as well.

Easy enough to call people lowe luvvies but you still have yet to post an alternative option.

That's how I imagined Stanley to look.

Sturrock was not given a chance and Hoddle could of been worse than Wigley, one thing is for sure we will never know who would of been better. It's history so get over it.

Absolutely, Hoddle had his chance here and moved on, then became a failure. It's now time for Dalek to move on and get over his love affair with Hoddle.

I'd love to but unfortunately I will be back in Warwick working, please have a pint for me.

The bloke (won't give his name) who has three seats next to me is from Salisbury :shock: I'm pretty sure he is not Scooby

I think we are at the moment As this email was from a couple of weeks ago have you had a reply yet?

When, you have a date for his departure? I'm sure there will be a big party when he does.

I read the various Saints forums and speak to fans at St Mary's (sorry don't get the signal for the radio phone ins up here) and know the fans are split but until the so called knights in shining armour appear we have to make do with who we have. For that reason we have to be united behind the team and don't let your personal hatred of one man get in the way of supporting the boys on the pitch. However if you would rather take the hatred on one man against supporting your team then that is your choice.

Never been a Lowe fanatic and never will be, I just want posters like you to tell me what the alternative is and why it has yet to happen, or if it's going to happen then when will it happen. However if the knight in shining armour doesn't appear and Lowe leaves today/tomorrow then whoever takes over the reign will be left in much the same position as Lowe, ie NO FVCKING MONEY WITH THE CLUB IN DEBT.

Pathetic.

And you have evidence of this then, if so please enlighten us.

You try to.

Jonah posted some good stuff, certainly not 'spitting out dummies' stuff. Try reading it first and you will find it contains some good and honest points.

Pathetic.

Bull****

Long Shot has been dropping hints/cryptic clues etc for months now but to no avail. If these so called white knights are waiting in the wings why are they just watching us sink further down the pan? He say's he can't say too much, I just wished he'd put up or shut up.

Surely if you want a removable of a board you must have a viable replacement...

Perhaps those 'supporters' who want us to lose tomorrow should take heed of this post.

The bold part is an excellent post and and I agree entirely. There has been no alternatives willing to take over the mess so if Lowe was removed without an injection of cash we would still be in the same sh1t. The bit not in bold? I remain hopeful in my normal optimistic way and I'm going for a draw