S-Clarke

Take a note of LeG's posts, he's very much in the know of the Guan/K'billy ilk - not sure who he is (could be one of those two with a new account I guess). He's certainly connected in some way.

WHU fans don't really have a clue tbh, even their club as a whole has no idea. They love to to waste their time going after entirely unrealistic options, i.e. Amorim to replace Moyes, and then Mazraoui was another entirely unrealistic target. They've had loads of similar efforts over the years, thinking they are bigger than they really are. They are middle of the road also-rans, can occasionally get Europe in a good season, but equally as likely to be embroiled in a relegation battle. They're just one of the rest of the PL. Nothing special.

Ah these sorts of rumours are like a nod to the past, this is how the transfer window used to be. None of this Romano stuff! Maybe we can get Pilchards back up the tree outside Staplewood to see if he can spot Rudi Skacel!

He could fancy a change up for this year. Dortmund have just bought another striker (who I quite liked - Guirassy) so his chances may be even more limited, they have Fullkrug and Haller too. He defo hasn't at yet hit his hyped potential at Dortmund, which has lead to him being in and out of the side a bit. If he's available on loan (that's all it will be) then there will be a dozen takers. This is what will start to happen now though, 'elite' clubs will have top players somewhat surplus and this is where we need to put the loan market to use - we did it very well last year.

No way are we loaning out Ronnie Edwards, he'll be part of the first team. We'll end up selling him for £30m+ in a few years, mark my words on that - guy is a class act. He's a John Stones/Jarrad Brathwaite-esque lower league pickup.

The loan would make sense to me - keeps our powder dry this summer in relation to PSR, so we get a striker but on our books this year we haven't paid anything (bar a loan fee). Could be one like the THB one, turns into an obligation process if we stay up - but the loan just expires if we go down. Protects both parties.

Only the second half of the season, but he was in the running for Sheff U's player of the season - not hard going by how horrific they were though. The general consensus with their fans is that had he been there from the start, they'd have been much more competitive as he changed their attack around.

Charlie Taylor was playing in the PL in 23/24, 21/22, 20/21, 19/20 - you get the drift. He's a premier league player and we signed him on a free transfer, from Burnley, who were playing in the PL last year. Brooks was far from shite, certainly didn't live up to full expectations, but added quality to our front end without question. I'm really confused by your points, because on one hand you are bemoaning people wanting to get rid of Mara and Sulemana, yet on the other hand you call out Brooks as playing shite.

Some Sheffield United fan views - pretty much all positive, cannot find anyone moaning about him (and they had a lot to moan about last year)

It's somewhat the polar opposite of what we did the last time we were in this league. We got the likes of Mara for £12m (11.95m he cost, believe it or not - Jesus), whilst other clubs went for more experienced options at similar prices. £20m for Delap is something we'd have done, well we were trying to do, but we seem to have learnt. £8m on a attacking signing is food and drink for a PL club, if he fails....we've not just spunked over £20m on someone, so financially we won't be screwed should be need to switch out next summer - but if he does reasonably well, even 10 goals, he has paid back £8m and we will be sat on easily double or 3 times profit should we sell.

Are you suggesting Sulemana and Mara know how we play? They don't even understand football in it's simplest terms, so they would be of no loss to any professional football club. Ross Stewart doesn't know how we play because he's never played. We could lose Ross, Sulemana and Mara, and not replace them and we'd still be no weaker than we are with them.

Are you confusing him with Dibling? Ballard has done sod all in pre-season, was injured all of last year and needs proper mens football to see if he's any good.

That's an interesting note on Fraser - I always assumed that was a done and dusted bit of business, but to me that sounds like the club have moved on from him now. Maybe Newcastle were asking for stupid money and we wanted him on a free? Could be something like that. I like Fraser last year, was pretty effective for us - opportunity to get an upgrade on him though.

They signed a massive 6ft 8 keeper in the summer too - clubs like Forest have no strategy when it comes to buying players, they just stockpile.

Scored as well, almost certainly deal off!

Replace Goalkeepers with Strikers and it's the same track record. To put it blunt, our scouting and recruitment for permanent additions for too many years has been horrendous and is why we were relegated.

Yeah I look at Dibling and see a player there who can make a genuine impact, I say get him tied down to a longer deal first though - as I'm sure 15 mins in the PL, doing well, will make all the clubs want to buy him - it's the way the daft world works these days. He looks like he has that Shaw/Bale swagger about him to me anyway. Amo is good too, but I reckon he'll be the one to loan out. It's a shame guys like Sulemana got more game time than either of those young kids last year, travesty really.

I don't think you could say he's worse tbf, but on equal footing - probably. All it does is go to ram home the utter ineptness of our striker recruitment, not just over 1 year, but many fucking years. Even last year we again fucked up with our striker signing. Whoever in our recruitment team is tasked with scouting strikers sack them...and get someone who knows wtf they're doing, because whoever is currently doing it has no scooby.

Dibling looks to have a bit of a physical presence about him this year, which helps backup his high level of technical ability. Will be interesting to see how he goes in the proper pre-season games. Sam Amo ditto. I think we all know it's time to give up on Mara, it was last year to be fair. But scarily he is our only number 9 option as it stands (I discount Stewart entirely). I have nightmares of watching him try to play football in the PL again. I had enough nightmares watching him try to play football in the Championship! He does look non-plused and half arsed on the pitch, but his style is like that - he's got quite a laid back demeanour, the problem with him is that he doesn't have any level of footballing ability to backup that demeanour, so his laid back approach just pisses people off even more.

We've painted ourselves into a bit of a corner with Onuachu. We overpaid on him by some distance out of pure desperation, he was a £10m player tops. Genk saw us coming, bit like Monaco with Carillo. We will never be getting north of £10m for a player who was never worth that in the first place. I'd say £7.5m is a fair value and I imagine something being settled in that region. He won't stay here.

I wouldn't say the reactions are just based on that, I think it's been pretty clear that's been the plan since he got injured. Stop gap signing until he's back.

These sorts of signings, whilst announced by Southampton, will probably never, ever play for us. I think it's the reality of being part of a multi-club model, the 'main' club acquires the players and then the other clubs profit (At lesser leagues etc). Man City do it all the time, throw their players at Girona - then they do well there, they come back and they pocket a real profit on them when they sell them. So I don't see these guys as Southampton players, they're a profit vehicle for the multi-club model.

Yes, maybe - if we play as open as we did last year then we will be in for some real records of goals conceded that's for sure! I'm intrigued to see how we do really, the slightly more pragmatic approach in the playoffs suggested a slight tweak to how we approach better sides - well, we're facing 17 better sides next year so maybe we'll be a lot more pragmatic than we all think!

The biggest non-surprise ever, the club were never going to sign a new first choice to potentially oust Bazunu - never happening. This was the opportunity to do it, but the club see something in Bazunu that no one else in football does. I just want a keeper that makes saves, nothing spectacular, just saves. Bazunu doesn't make saves so I don't know why we're still pinning our future on him. Statistically the worst GK in England's top two leagues in the last two seasons, not even a close contest either - miles off the nearest. Good with the ball at his feet though. I hope the club target a first team loan though and not a squad filler, but I have always had the feeling that we'll have McCarthy as first choice with a squad filler signed to cover Bazunu's absence. Count me surprised if we do anything different.