
Thorpe-le-Saint
Members-
Posts
4,739 -
Joined
Everything posted by Thorpe-le-Saint
-
Saints 2 - 0 Shrewsbury - post match reaction
Thorpe-le-Saint replied to Saint_clark's topic in The Saints
What a crap game followed by 90 seconds of madness! Hopefully Chelmsford won and we get them away in the 2nd round. -
There we go, left it bloody late - round two here we come.
-
Thank God for that, we really didn't want a replay. Well done Adkins, you had it under control all along
-
2-0 lol
-
Get the **** in
-
3 mins added on time, replay here we come.
-
3 mins plus stoppage left.
-
I tell you what though, I'm not travelling to some Midland back-water on a Tuesday night to the "Pro Star" stadium to see us lose the replay!
-
Solent - His tone of voice, he sounded disgusted that there was only that many in SMS.
-
Saints do not need a replay.
-
10k in SMS - why is the commentator so suprised?!
-
Boring!
-
Meh, still expect us to win.
-
They might have the last laugh though if we get Pompey away in the 3rd round...
-
Are Shrewsbury singing "Premiership/Championship and you ****ed it up!"?!? ****ing losers, who are you again?!
-
You sir, well played sir!
-
How many Shrewsbury fans have shown up...?
-
I'm listening to the Shrewsbury feed, but still a faint echo - unbelivable.
-
Nope, just gone back to the 'dual commentary' after 30 seconds. ****ing crap.
-
If you refresh it, it should sort it self out...
-
Brilliant performance by SaintsPlayer again: I've got both Bournemouth AND Saints commentary on the same feed. ****ing crap!
-
Oh well fair enough if that is the case, just seemed a bit risky to field arguably our best player against a team who will probably have no qualms in kicking lumps out of him
-
No need to field such a strong team in my opinion. Why risk Lallana?
-
The Spending Review (tackling the Socialists debt mountain)
Thorpe-le-Saint replied to dune's topic in The Lounge
1) You realise he wasn't talking about Marshall aid right? That came after the war. 2) We didn't need to re-build indsutry! Industry may have been geared on a war footing, but it could be/was easily switched back. 3) Atlee was the PM after the war (which he won by a landslide) because the country was up the spout from a social stand point, so of course he had to focus on services. If if Churchil had been re-elected, as a former Liberal, was one of the main driving forces behind social reforms at the turn of the century it could easily be argued he would have done the same thing! 4) Before Dune or someone of his ilk comes back with "He couldn't have done a good job if Churchill was re-elected", the reasons behind why Atlee lost the election at the start of the 50s was because of his performances at the post-war conferences. -
I don't think we could have done, we have too many people with far too many agendas to ever form a united front.