Thorpe-le-Saint

No 1 seat won't make a blind bit of difference.

I'm suprised it's taken you this long! Where is your Abu Hamza thread by the way?

I think I can hear Dune gathering pitchforks as we speak...

I'm not concerned: Both Clinton and Reagan took batterings in their first mid-terms and look at how they long lasted...

Nope, afraid not. Saintsplayer uses Adobe Flash and Apple and Adobe don't get on to say the least. You can't access and Flash player content on the IPhone.

4-0, Fonte, that'll do pig, that'll do.

You watch Col U get a winner and make us drop out the play-off spots.

Barnard off - Bignall on. Lambert off - Guly on.

Saints are winning and I'm bored...what is the matter with me?! 3-0 Barnard! Easy.

Out of nowhere! 2-0 saints, AOC. What a player, get that kid on a 5 year deal!!

Daggers go close - we need to be careful.

Sounds like it should have been 2-0, lallana misses a sitter.

That'll do! 1-0 Saints

Minutes silence very well observed, COYR!

Why does Saints Player (Solent) seem to be focusing on Bournemouth tonight?

We've got to be careful not to underestimate Dagenham and Redbridge, but all things considered, you would expect us to win this. However, it's a funny old game and all that.

Postal votes.

Would like to think we can snatch it, but I have a feeling it will be 2-2. Here's hoping for a great weekend!

You forgot that bastion of 'Britishness'; Tea!

Can we add an individual holding the door open for another to this list? I cannot stand it when I'm walking behind someone and they just let the door slam shut; hold it open you disgusting oik. Furthermore, should someone not say 'thank you' when I hold the door open they themselves are in danger of having their name turned to mud.

How did I not notice this the other night? You've made yourself look like a doughnut again! If you were to ever read Karl Marx (I've read 'Mein Kampf' so it shouldn't be too much of a struggle for you) you would see that Marx advocates a withering away of the state and law in Socialist/Communist countries.

Speaking 'selfishly' if I may, I personally on here haven't complained ONCE about increased pension contributions from teachers, or the reduction in the number of 'behind the scenes' staff from schools etc; I, personally (I won't be so bold as to claim all teachers) am getting on with it. What I can't stand is the private sector's very obvious 'chip' on it's shoulder about how they have had to bare the brunt. Credit where it is due, they have suffered far worse so far than the public sector, and I too would moan, HOWEVER, they had/have got their DEMOCRATIC RIGHT to unionise and/or oppose. If they don't want to do that, then fine it's your choice, but I don't want to have to keep hearing people bleat on about job losses when I'm struggling to find an example of the private sector opposing job losses. Perhaps this is due to the nature of the markets, but I feel it is still a valid complaint.

Oh behave: What you've described there is the foundations on which the private sector is built on! "We will provide an inferior product, for as much sodding profit as possible and sod the mug of a consumer who walks through the door." 'The public sector', the clue is in the name; it's there to help the public. 'The private sector' in it's truest form is there to benefit the individual only. PLUS I've already said once on here that those in the private sector should unionise and received a torrent of abuse. Personally I don't see why it is so stupid; you may not have suffered as many job losses.

One incident on one radio show is hardly concrete. I appreciate that you're not going to be able to provide me with a list of examples however. Therefore it cannot be proved, it is only a hunch or at best a presumption

Quite literally?