Mole

Not to everyone, myself included.

I told you last week, but obviously you weren't paying attention.

I know people who know him and he is wealthy (i dunno if he's wealthy enough) and a massive Saints fan. Those i've spoken to who know him speak very highly of him. It's people like him we need in a consortium.

You keep digging.

I wouldn't think so. I'd expect many of the officers to be Saints fans and as such agree with the protest.

Yes they are both lower, but in comparitive terms we are not following the trend.

Well you obviously aren't very good at reading charts. I'll simplyfy the data for you. Over the past 3 moths the FTSE 100 is : -2.65% Over the past 3 months SLH is : - 25% I hope this helps.

Southampton Leisure 3 month trend FTSE 100 3 month trend Over the past 3 months the FTSE has been up and down a bit but is currently near enough what it was 3 months ago. SLH shares have been constanly sliding. This clearly shows that we are not following the trend of other companies.

The FTSE trend in recent days has been upwards. The trend at SFC has been downwards.

Takeover speculation (genuine takeover speculation that it is i.e SISU) makes the share price go up. The share price is falling at present with a .75p drop being significant given the share price. It equates to circa 4%.

Thanks for honouring me with your last post of the day Somedunce. XXX

If anyone is taking part please film it and post it on youtube.

It wouldn't have been amusing if there had been a fire.

I was going to post this earlier when it was 20p. It looks like city have got wind of something as the FTSE has been on the rise the past few days.

Exactly. I'd be highly surprised if someone went to the extreme effort and expense of flying to Jersey to lob a rock through his window. I'd say it's more likely he has enemies on the island or it's just a random attack by teenagers. The 4x4 incident sounds more like an abandoned burglary. The glueing of the locks appears to be SFC related if a note was left though.

It's just some nutter who would never carry out the threat IMHO. No-body wants Wilde dead, we just don't want him at our club.

I've already said that death threats are wrong, but gallows humour is part of football mate.

Get a grip.

I'd say so.

I'd love to see the actual email to look for tell tale signs.

Make your mind up Adrian. Let's cut to the chase. You are just ****ed off because you are in a minority with the vast majority of fans wanting Lowe Out. Now let's tackle the issue of fans fighting fans. I witnessed two events during the Donny game: Event 1 A pro Lowe supporter telling people not to sing Lowe Out songs - he got decked. It later came out on here that the said decked fan had at halftime got an anti Lowe chanter (smaller than him) by the throat on the concourse. Later in the game he was set upon. Event 2 Behind where i was sitting there was a neanderthal calling those singing anti Lowe songs "fvcking morons" and acting in an aggressive manner. It was my take of the situation that he was looking for a fight. No fight occured in this instance. You are trying to label the anti Lowe element as thugs, but in reality it cuts both ways. That all said the root cause of the symptons is Rupert Lowes presence. He is a divisive presence and the situation will not improve until he's gone.

If anyone has the full article can they post it up please.

So you do agree Lowes presence is having a detrimental financial effect on the club. Thanks for being so honest. Now given this admission do you agree that their positions are untenable?

The division is the symptom of Lowe and Wildes presence. Their presence is the cause.