Jump to content

Window Cleaner

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    32,021
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Window Cleaner

  1. Neal bowls pretty tidily most of the time and Gubbins is playing really well in this competition, taken a couple of outstanding catches as well. Hope there's some Hants input to the commentary for the Middx game, the Gloucs chaps were a bit painful yesterday, a lot of jobs for the boy's stuff and whingeing about trifles. Hope we play Abbott and Barker cos if Organ has to bowl at Radlett he will get massacred.
  2. Ah great Middlesex. Commentators were saying Warks, but I guess they didn't figure on Warks losing on D/L suppose there must have been rain. So a Radlett slogfest then.
  3. Got there in the end, mainly thanks to the fabulous start from Orr and Gubbins. Warks next? We'll need to bowl better at Edgbaston. Perhaps have a sixth bowler on hand .
  4. Well yes but it apparently rakes in a lot of money. Can't see why exactly that would be, apart from a few fading international "stars" it seems to be just a mish-mash of county players. Don't think it was like that at the start but I suppose the continual international series have taken their toll viz à viz the global stars. When you see blokes like Donald in Hundred squads you have to wonder why people flock to games.
  5. I just assume that qualifying for the quarters wasn't considered to be of interest. The bowling line up is totally wrong.
  6. Why oh why do we keep playing Organ? Abbott was a far better option, or Fuller. Incomprehensible.
  7. Good start, brief rain interlude and now I don't like the look of it. Wild bowling from Jack gave them 15 off an over and Lumsden showing his youth and inexperience. Might have needed one more experienced bowler. Price being dropped by Albert at point certainly hasn't helped; We'll see how it goes.
  8. Fairly simple. We couldn't play at the Utilita on the appointed day because there's a Brave match. No alternative so we'd have to give up home advantage. Great start, Jack bowled Bancroft second ball of the innings.
  9. Just seen the group for tomorrow's game, McMullen, Wheal and Fuller not present, Albert, Barker and Lumsden added, the rest looks the same as yesterday. .
  10. Probably not in the spirit of the game but in fact a wash-out would be pretty handy actually. Guaranteed 2 points, qualification assured. I think they said that McMullen has played his last game for us, in this stint anyway. So we'll need to find a replacement, suppose it will be either Jack or Kelly then, unless of course we get someone released from a Hundred team.
  11. Scenario already discussed a couple of seasons back. Didn't do that then and I doubt we'll do it now. Vince isn't batting well and Dawson although he would be very useful has other things planned.
  12. Well, that was excellent. Well done the lads. Good watch too.
  13. So, 340 to get, don't really know if we have the batters to get them honestly. Depends on Orr and Gubbins? We probably need to go to about 150 without loss in 21-22 overs.
  14. Losing this one is not beyond the realms of possibility. Too much poor bowling and I'd say that the fielding is slightly below our normal standard. Will all depend on Gubbins again likely as not.
  15. Was going to say that it's not going as well as I expected but Organ has just bowled Jewell so we'll see. Brown behind the stumps? Maybe a bit less athletic than Mayes to be honest. A few byes.
  16. Derbys today, Hants won toss, fielding first. Brown in, Prest out. Bowling looks better than that of Wednesday. Need the win, should see us in the quarters.
  17. Seems that our seamers weren't better than theirs. Jack very expensive. Why no Fuller ? On another note Prest continues his train-wreck of a season.
  18. Surrey don't seem to take this competition very seriously. Batting and bowling today public rec standard. If they're consistent about it I suppose it doesn't much matter. They had quite a good crowd in though today, bit of an affront to them to play so poorly.
  19. Bowled really well. Surrey batted really poorly, perhaps a result of aforesaid good bowling though.
  20. Video game tactics, or so any French fan would tell you. He didn't have the necessary coaching certificates so Reims were fined 25000 euros for each match he was in charge. Also had Etikite and two Japanese wingers.
  21. Our number 17 is rubbish.
  22. Good news on the bowling front, batting looks short though. Hope there's no silly flashing from Orr. We need a big start, 100/0 sort of thing.
  23. Ball seemed to hit him on the wrist. Other than that not much to be said about yesterday's game. Their seam quintet was too good for our batting and our bowling wasn't good enough to challenge them with such a faible total to defend. Quick'ish seam bowling does seem to present us with a problem on occasions. Not much spin to slog yesterday.
  24. Finally a very entertaining second half of our innings. We'll see if it's enough.
  25. Not looking any too great at the moment. 4 down with just 115 on the board after half way.
×
×
  • Create New...