Unbelievable Jeff

...and why they don't make good swimmers. There's nothing racist about this policy, if it is even used. It is purchasing players that fit into a system based on their physical attributes. Let's use the NFL as an example. You hardly get any outside threat WR's who are white because they aren't tall enough/quick enough/strong enough. However, you do tend to get them in the middle of the field as they tend to have more ability to get open in tight spaces.

Yeah, can you imagine getting so annoyed at something so inane. It's like reporting someone because they produced a funny comic strip about a member...oh hang on.

It's not a surprise at all, not saying it is, but you were saying if you haven't done 5 aways. I have done but will be well down the list.

I've done 8 aways, but I'm not a ST holder, so where does that place me?

Not when they have to open another tier that will be closed for the game. That's the issue.

I think the reason they're not giving more is that they will need to open more of the ground to do it, and this results in higher policing costs, especially when it's English fans coming over.

True...buy an Inter scarf and then get in.

Agreed, may well be up for that as doesn't look like we'll get in any other way.

So what's the conclusion on who's going to get Milan tickets then. Will it get past season ticket holder? I'm a member with a lot of aways, just a bit worried that I won't get an Inter ticket now.

Why? Some of the posters have previous for it.

Edit

#ambition

TBH, if you're the person I think you are on Twitter, I wouldn't class you as equipped to have an opinion...

We were in the "Winners" in the "Winners and Losers" on Football 365 too...maybe some of our fans just don't know what they're talking about. That's what I'd go with.

Not necessarily in the long run though? You're judging on a stunted pre-season and without Bertrand in the team (full backs are crucial to the system). Plus. We look better than we did at this time last year when Koeman had a full preseason.

Judging by the people that have a problem, it's probably because he's not caucasian.

Personally, I don't think any footballer is worth the prices that are paid for and to them. This is the problem with spouting anything about a players 'value', because the only tangible value is their transfer fee. Everything else is an opinion. We also promised we'd sell him this summer for that amount after last Summers transfer window.

That's fine, you think VVD is worth less than £35m. Personally, I think he's worth more than that.

http://www.football365.com/news/transfer-window-winners-and-losers-3 Southampton Only time will tell, but Southampton have repeated that same old trick of conducting their business quietly and efficiently. More key individuals were lost this summer, including their manager, two main goal threats and midfield powerhouse, but the performances of Nathan Redmond and Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg so far are cause for optimism. Add a club-record signing in Sofiane Boufal, and while Saints are unlikely to continue their remarkable record of improving their league position in six successive seasons, they should again be proud of their business.

Yes, they were, but they decided they weren't worth that much, and so looks like they weren't those clubs most valuable players. That's my point.

But we didn't lose our most valuable player, did we?

A player is only worth what someone is prepared to pay for them, surely? Otherwise I'd definitely say VVD is more valuable than Mane.

So, the point was they were able to keep their most valuable players. They weren't. Pelle and Wanyama certainly weren't on the most valuable list.

Stones and Kante. Vardy was only worth £20m, no idea what Lukaku is worth but Chelsea didn't want to pay the £65m Everyone wanted, so I would guess it's similar to Stones. Arsenal wouldn't pay £40m for Mahrez.