TwoPints

For a man so insistent on getting answers to his questions, you're not too good at answering them are you. You've been asked twice what you expected in a 'backlash' that hasn't already been shown to you but you've so far not answered. Apart from thousands of Muslims fighting ISIS in the middle east, Muslim groups around the world condemning their actions, as well as the links to protests that you have already been shown, what exactly do you expect to see in your 'backlash'. I have a feeling that I know what your response will be but it would be nice if I was proved wrong and you were actually able to give a sensible answer.

Just because you keep saying there wasn't a backlash doesn't make it true. There clearly was, you just don't want to see it.

There clearly has been a backlash and certainly more of a backlash from Muslims than non Muslims. It's just that you can't be bothered to look for evidence that doesn't support your view. Worldwide condemnation by Muslim leaders across the globe is quite a backlash and there are many more Muslims fighting ISIS than non Muslims. Not sure what more you'd expect.

I'm sorry, I've been driving through Belgium (honestly hypo) to Germany. I'll be back soon though. ?

Yes but you're not allowed to compare atrocities by Heads of State on here as that has some other label that's not terrorism... Apparently.

And on what basis have you made that calculation given that there were plenty of nazi sympathisers and supporters throughout Europe, including in the UK during the nazi rule of Germany and other countries? I would say it's very difficult to make such a claim with the information available.

No.

In the same way that the deeds and actions of the terrorists are pretty much the polar opposite of the teachings of Muhammad? Virtually anyone with even an iota of knowledge about Islam would agree that the terrorists actions were not those of a follower of Muhammed?

If I didn't know you better I would think you were flirting with me.

Don't get too excited whelk. I've read all the posts, not singled yours out. I was just surprised that you continue to talk about me when I haven't posted on here.

I don't think we are to be fair, not with the likes of you, batman and sour mash about, we're onto anything but a winner.

I'm not sure if I'm one of the apologists to whom you refer but I don't disagree with anything you've said here.

To be honest whelk. You seem to be the only one that was appearing to be challenged by my posts. Once you get over your inferiority complex, people might take more notice of what you're saying but I doubt it to be honest as I haven't seen anything of any value written by you.

Fair nuff. I'll take dinlow. I'm normally called a ****.

Just like Fry. Where have I said that it's got nothing to do with Islam?

1. It's quite simple to evidence that Muslims aren't the only people to commit terrorist atrocities across the world. There's no trawling the four corners of the Internet involved. 2. Maybe you could direct me to my post where I have mentioned the second world war, or Mexican drug cartels. I think your imagination is running away with you. 3. Maybe you could point out where I have said that Christians are probably worse. 4. Where have I ever mentioned British soldiers never mind soldiers singing hymns? If you want to challenge what I've said Fry that's fine but make sure you know what you're talking about before you do so.

Wow! Such flippant comments in response to the death of over 60 people in Pakistan. Unbelievable. What was your line again Fry? Oh Yea "Several thousand Muslims did not die so you could smug it up on a football forum. Beneath contempt.". It's ok when it's only several 10s of Muslims is it? Or is it because your outrage only applies to "genocide" and not terrorism?

I'm not sure I have a Sabbath although a day of rest would be nice.

Which is odd as I've explained why I didn't reply. I'm happy to reply if it would put your mind at rest but you'll have to wait for that as I'm off to work now.

So you do want me to reply to your post that didn't ask for a reply then? It's clearly bothering you.

Well, that's what you would of got and I assumed you wouldn't agree so didn't bother. Glad I don't need to bother. Happy Easter.

So, do you still want me to reply to that post of yours that didn't ask for a reply? Happy to do so but you won't like the response and I'm not sure it'll add much to the topic of the thread. But if it would make you happy I'll do it just for you.

Look at you getting all precious about me not replying to your post. I can't actually find one that required a reply to be fair. The last one from you was just some confused rambling that didn't need a response. As for sulking that you haven't had a response, you might recall that you still haven't answered the last question I put to you about which parts of SMs posts you found 'extreme'. It's a two way street mate, you can't complain about a lack of response if you don't respond yourself.

Ooh, an accidental compliment. Thanks. As for 'being good at it'. It's a ****ing football forum, not a GSCE in talking ********. I just come on here, say what I think and if people think I'm a **** then I'm OK with that. As for swearing being due to a lack of vocab, not sure who you think I am but I couldn't give a flying **** whether you swear or not. I don't look down on people who swear and don't look up to people that don't. In the whole scheme of things, what people say on here is of very little importance to anything.

...