Jump to content

Cedric


Pamplemousse
 Share

Recommended Posts

VvD, on of the leagues best CB’s has been at fault for goals in his career. What’s your point.

 

Stop talking utter nonsense, like claiming Adkins is a better manager than BFS.

 

I can’t work out if you’re a WUM or just completely ****ing clueless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VvD, on of the leagues best CB’s has been at fault for goals in his career. What’s your point.

 

Stop talking utter nonsense, like claiming Adkins is a better manager than BFS.

 

I can’t work out if you’re a WUM or just completely ****ing clueless.

 

Go on then, show me the stats, show me his positive contributions.

 

Considering he’s Portugal’s Number 1 right back, it’s fair to ask why he isn’t contributing more.

 

Try engaging instead of abusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go on then, show me the stats, show me his positive contributions.

 

Considering he’s Portugal’s Number 1 right back, it’s fair to ask why he isn’t contributing more.

 

Try engaging instead of abusing.

 

The game isn’t played with stats though, isit you Fool. But anyway, let’s compare to the man he replaced:

 

Tackle success % (pretty important as a FB, is it not):

 

Clyne - 71%

Cedric - 75%

 

He may not be the best in the final 3rd, but of all the players to pick on, Cedric isn’t one of them. Now back in your cave you clown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The game isn’t played with stats though, isit you Fool. But anyway, let’s compare to the man he replaced:

 

Tackle success % (pretty important as a FB, is it not):

 

Clyne - 71%

Cedric - 75%

 

He may not be the best in the final 3rd, but of all the players to pick on, Cedric isn’t one of them. Now back in your cave you clown.

 

I wasn't questioning his defending, I'm questioning his attacking ability. I'm not surprised that you clearly don't get it.

 

Nice to see you unable to engage in a debate without abusing again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't questioning his defending, I'm questioning his attacking ability. I'm not surprised that you clearly don't get it.

 

Nice to see you unable to engage in a debate without abusing again.

 

Nope. Your question was:

 

What is he good at?

 

I told you what he is good at.

 

Don’t try and backtrack now you’ve been proven to look an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Your question was:

 

 

 

I told you what he is good at.

 

Don’t try and backtrack now you’ve been proven to look an idiot.

 

And as I said, to be a good modern full back, you have to be able to attack. He'd be a centre back if he could only defend.

 

You do understand modern football, right?

 

Compare him to Bertrand, who is far more effective going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as I said, to be a good modern full back, you have to be able to attack. He'd be a centre back if he could only defend.

 

You do understand modern football, right?

 

Compare him to Bertrand, who is far more effective going forward.

 

Bertrand is a better player, well done for pointing that out.

 

Cedric is no means great going forward, but he is probably on par with Clyne, who you’d have every day of the week.

 

He offers us pace and width down the right hand side, which we currently lack. He works hard, continually offering an overlap, and is generally solid defensively.

 

As someone else has said, if we were to sell, he’d have many suitors.

 

Who would you have ahead of him from our squad and who would you bring in to replace him then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...