aintforever

Happened at he same time from what I saw, it's the sort of decision that goes in favour of the keeper 99 times out of 100. He's throwing himself into the keeper and turning his back.

Exactly, clearly a foul. Fraser only drops it because some Spurs cunt has thrown himself into his body.

They are trying to encourage people to get boosted so makes sense. What is your point?

This.

'may inquire to confirm status'. Fuck me, all Eddie Howe has to do is say he can't name 13 players and it's called off - what a joke. Just need a few players to say "gaffer I've picked up a knock" and they get to re-arrange to suit them.

Even more room to manipulate if they include other injuries, they can make up whatever they want. Gary Neville is right when he says it’s dodgy that clubs ask for a postponement, then when it is turned down end up fielding an almost full strength side.

So all they need is a couple of covid cases then just make up a few injuries to get it postponed. Surely it should just be Covid that matters otherwise it is just wide open to be abused.

Do you still want Ralph sacked then?

I don’t think number of beds has ever been a problem, it’s staff, especially ICU.

There are no excuses, we are just not very good it it. It’s fucking embarrassing.

I guess it depends what is classed as significant. If someone is short of breath and they know they have a potentially fatal disease they are probably thinking there is nothing to lose by getting checked out. The way the media hype it up you can guarantee some just turn up with a bit of a cough though.

There is plenty to read on the subject without just listening to what Whitty and Bozo have to say on their news conferences.

I don't listen to a word that fat sack of shite says, only a fool would put their trust in politicians especially the Torys. Listen to the doctors and scientists.

It's all good. I expect once we are past this wave it wont be long before it becomes endemic and it will just be like the flu with yearly jabs for those that want it. All depends how it mutates though I suppose.

They have to prepare for the worst and hope for the best, most sensible people understood what the modelling is for. Problem is they do the worst case modelling (which they have to do), the media pick up on it and make sensationalist headlines with some scary graphics and some people don't understand the context, and either shit them selves or think it's some big conspiracy.

It's always a balancing act and we are still yet to see how many hospitalisations the NHS will have to deal with but the priority has to be health and the NHS. The government just need to make sure decent compensation is available to businesses effected.

Agree with this. I hate the scruffy fat cunt with a passion but we were right to take precautionary measures until more was known about the virus. Not sure why anyone is wetting their pants over it, we can still go out and get pissed up and go to a football match/nightclub/strip club whatever.

They obviously want people to be jabbed with two doses before they classify them as vaccinated - what's the big deal?

I guess the vaccines take while to take effect so you are not fully vaccinated until some time after your second jab. Makes sense.

I would email Chris Whitty or an epidemiologist if you want to know more about it if I were you. There are obviously a lot of factors involved such as age of population, geography of the country, previous exposure and effectiveness of vaccines. It should become clearer in the next couple of weeks or so.

How well two vaccines can stop serious illness is obviously one of the things SAGE are working out, it looks like they help make illness less severe which is great. But this variant has a huge ability to bypass immune protection and cause breakthrough infections and as it spreads way faster it will reach more vulnerable people quicker, it's right we are taking precations while SAGE works out the risks.

What, the WHO website that also says: "Countries should continue to implement the effective public health measures to reduce COVID-19 circulation overall, using a risk analysis and science-based approach. They should increase some public health and medical capacities to manage an increase in cases. " I'm pretty sure that's what Bozo is doing.

It's not my research, I'm guessing confirmed cases is different to actual cases, the more a country tests the more confirmed cases there are. The point of the article is that each country will have to work out how the virus could possibly effect their populations, that's obviously what SAGE are doing now and why they are taking precautionary measures until they know more.

According to infectious disease specialist Dr. Roby Bhattacharyya and epidemiologist William Hanage that's not right. Maybe you should email them to let them know the findings of your research.