miserableoldgit

"These Tesco burgers are low in fat but high in shergar I just checked the Tesco burgers I have in the fridge.......... THEY'RE OFF!!!!!!!!! Tesco say that the public are not concerned about horse meat in their burgers according to the Gallup Poll figures" "Is it a coincidence that 'HAMBURGERS' is an anagram of 'SHERGAR BUM' ? And some more....... I took some Tesco burgers out if the freezer this morning..... nearly thawed, they are going good to soft! I complained at the checkout today that I had Zebra meat in my burger, then I realised it was the barcode"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2262694/Vegard-Forren-abandons-Liverpool-trial-Southampton-talks.html

If Suarez or anyone else obviously and deliberately dives, I will come on here and complain (if that`s alright with you) but if Saurez, or anybody else gets involved in a situation like yesterdays, I will come on here and complain about the ref for making a balls up, because that`s what happened yesterday.

No you won`t. There have been several versions/explainations of what happened but none of them have convinced you yet. You have a strongly held opinion and you are entitled to it as I am to mine.

You have just proved my point. Laughing at those with a different opinion to yours. If/when JRod, or any other Saints player deliberately and obviously dives to get a penalty, I will condemn it as strongly as anyone else but I will not condemn him when in my opinion he did not deliberately and obviously dive for a penalty

What is amusing to me is that those who think that he deliberately dived are SO convinced that they are right that those of us that think that he didn`t dive are dimissed as biased and wearing red and white glasses. Surely the fact that there is such a split of opinions on here indicates that the situation is not as clear cut as it might be. I still maintain that he did not dive looking for a penalty. That is my opinion and I am allowed to have it..........aren`t I?

Thank you. This is basically what I was trying to say last night but not doing so very well. Hope that you have a tin helmet ready!!

Thank you.

"I am genuinely interested to know how you have seen something so different to what I have."

No you are quite right. I am wrong and my opinion counts for nothing. I have had enough of trying to justify my OPINION! Enjoy the rest of the week-end.

Possibly. I think that it was one of those situations that if it had happened anywhere else on the pitch wouldn`t have resulted in any decision from the ref. I think that JRod and the defender just came together and it ended up with JRod on the floor. It was the ref that ballsed up but JRod seems to be getting it in the neck as a cheater which I think is unfair. If it was a blatant dive I would condemn it straight away.

I watched the live stream and the countles replays. None of the commentators suggested that JRod dived. They just said that there was no contact, which was correct, and that the ref had got it wrong.

OK. You think that he dived, I think that he didn`t. Why do you think that he did?

And my OPINION is that he did not dive. Why do I have to justify my OPINION to you??

This from the person who was rigidly questioning me because my opinion was different from his!!

The forum police have spoken....he did. Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

"It happens all the time in football". So why threads and posts condemning him if he was doing what is the norm? Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

This^ Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

Are players allowed to try to avoid tackles? In doing so are they allowed to lose their balance? Of course not. It was a blatant dive. Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

I cannot believe that we are trying to crucify JRod for a split-second moment that got us three points against a relegation rival. My opinion is that it was not a dive. Others may disagree but how self-righteous are some on here? Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

Don't be so bloody silly. It was not a dive and even if it was it was not blatant. It was cleverly done. But it wasn't! Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

This^ Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

But it was a blatant dive.....apparently, so they were only reporting the facts....weren't they? Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

OK so in your world players only go to ground if it is a fair tackle, a foul or a dive and for no other reason?

Well it is all about opinions as they say. Having watch the game on line and watching the incident 5 or 6 time when it was replayed I still don`t think that it was a dive. That is nothing to do with being biased....it is my opinion. If it was an obvious dive, I would say so, but it seems that those that say it was a dive are correct in their opinions and those that say it wasn`t are just being biased......Hey Ho.....