saintjay77

Can you point me to where any 1 of your views have been proved right please? And for the record I now accept that because I dont follow the same one-dimensional, illogical and plain stupid view as Stanley I am of course a Lowe-Luvvie. Thanks for pointing that out. What name do you post under on the poopy forums?

I revealed my true identity yesterday and wished I hadnt. I have been mobbed at work and the phone is ringing off the hook. If only I was as popular as Mr Lowe!!!! in all seriousness though you know exactly what was meant by the same group of posters. Occasionally they come up with a thread that stirs some debate and people from all sides of the argument are able to get points accross and maybe change some opinions. That seems to come at the expence of many more threads basically having a rant at exactly the same thing with very little substance that hasnt been spouted off on an unlimitted number of other threads. The argument becomes boring rather than making anyone re-focus on anything. Just my opinion

To be fair there is nothing in the rules saying that the mods have to be impartial in there own views. But im sure there is something about multiple threads on teh same subject so he kinda has a point.

Only thing I would add to that is he is a Skate on a wind up. But otherwise :clappysmileyapplaudythingy:

if we went into admin as many times as had been expected we would be minus enough points to bury us for the next 15 years

Oh FFS Mind you it would be typicle of this club to kick us in the nuts as soon as there is a sniff of positivity in the air.

Those who jumped into the anyone but Lowe camp last time will find it harder to get support this time even though most would actually want anyone but Lowe. Think more people are a bit more jaded on who they would support as we have all been taken in before. I guess Mary is no different to the rest of us on that score.

Jesus have people had a sense of humour bypass this morning or what? lol

It depends on what they are going to start talking about. If Crouch wants a way in so he can try to change things then it will just end up in another battle. but if he just wants to be involved and help make the current system work then there is no reason why he cant join in when ever. Being a major shareholder he has a right to know whats going on and if he can help then fantastic. Most of us have been saying the way forward would be if all 3 can work together. Lowe has a chance here to either make himself look a knob and give Crouch the swans or suprise a few people and find a way to bring Crouch into the mix.

Ponty knew I was taking the p1ss which is all was intended.

Amphallang Apadravya Dydoe Frenum Guiche Hafada Lorum And the PA. Trust me you dont want to look up where some of those are though

he may have been looking for a fight or have had another reason but to be fair your original post said physically threatend. and that is quite a statement. had lowe physically threatend a women then the repocussions would have been huge. It doesnt matter if it was Lowe or any man really, its just not the done thing and rightly most people would be steaming about it. without clarifying that this whole debate started, did she say that or did she not? did she not mean to say it or did you not mean to? did you say that just to get a bit more bad feeling going against rupes or was it just what you thought she meant? plenty of questions and none of them answered until your reply. Now it looks like there was nothing sinister behind it and all the hype has been for nothing. but it gave us something other than admin to talk about for a day or so lol

foot in mouth, back track, foot in mouth, back track, foot in mouth, back track not easy to be politically correct is it? lol

Fair play to you. That was probably more ballenced than I was expecting TBH. I have nothing against anyone on here but do get hacked off when it appears people jump on bandwagons and rearrange quotes and events just to fit what they think. I think some of the original quotes by you on this subject appeared to put you into the catogory I have just mentioned. But your answer above puts that right IMO. Glad I was wrong on you not being the historian any more. Not sure why im glad but its better to hear you are rather than hear ole rosey cheeks has run you out. FWIW all this annonimous stuff gets a bit tiresome so im Jason Pace formally of Hedge End and its nice to meet you. Anyone that knows me wont admit it and I dont blame them but the whoe saintjay77/jas pace double identity thing is doing my head in.

Lol EMF?

you know I thought this thread was pretty humerous to start with but you my friend have had me spitting coffee all over my screen. Im voting for Hamster to be on the board.

"I am at the moment but might not later just incase anyone is interested" or "I am not right now but if anyone wants me to then i will later" TBF I got his option. lol

To be fair I took it as he was paraphrasing in one post and said so and in another he wasnt so tongue in cheek said so. dont know what the pair of you are arguing about lol

Thats the bit I was answering the question too.

Seconded!

His replacement is gone and we are now on his replacements replacement

R5 - "How is the feeling around the club on a day-to-day basis Gordon?" WGS - "It feels like a week day during the week and a weekend day at the weekend" R5 - "are the fans supportive within St Marys?" WGS - "no they are supportive on route to SMS and they sing on there way home but while they are here they sit and do knitting" LOL could be quite funny trying to answer reporters questions in the style of WGS

I wasnt having a pop at you just using your quote to air my view. Some of the things he has said have obviously got peoples backs up and I agreed with you that he needs to stay out of those areas. Im not sure if some of what he has said has been lost in translation or if he was genuinly having a go at sections of fans. It seems liek the english press find it easy to set him up with a few choice questions and feed for a week off his quotes. Can you imagine WGS answers to some of the questions Wotte has had? Had Wotte not been Lowes choice I just think be would have been cut a little more slack than he is getting now so I dont mind arguing his case when a few people start having kittens about what they thought he said.

Its all about opinions and of course we will all have different ones at times. Tis what makes it all more interesting. A few ifs here but anyway, If Wotte keeps us up and If Crouch comes back then I hope your right and he gives him a chance. If nothing else it will show Lowe up to be a numpty for not at least letting Pearson have a fair shot at moving us forward. Cant see it happening though

I agree, he needs to stay out of the politics but he only responded to a question on weather the protests are effecting the team or not. If he had said "no comment" there would have been an uproar at how he has been silences by a NDR or something. IMO he said the right things this time and still people jump up and down like he is the spawn of the anti christ.