Jump to content

Sir Ralph

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    1,391
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sir Ralph

  1. So today will be the day where the socialist party starts to really show their true colours. Down with aspiration and wealth, up with state reliance and wastage. All because of what happened in WW2 or something. Never had anything handed to me on a plate but Im about to get my pants pulled down (again) for no other reason than I work harder than the majority of my contemporaries. Welcome to socialist Britain Anyway at least we probably won’t see them again until I’ve retired
  2. Thats correct - I'm a rabid racist. Anyone like me and hypochondriac is.
  3. Not if he wasnt putting the effort in. I would be on his back explaining that he was throwing away the last 12-15 years of hard work and needed to remind himself of how he got here. You are responsible for your own actions on the pitch.
  4. Those that have been here over at least the last 2-3 seasons are likely to be part of the problem and need to go, barring a couple who try
  5. But he doesnt try and win headers, gets pushed off the ball, doesnt move, etc. I get you can look lethargic but if you give up on challenging for the ball isnt that just being lazy? Thats my problem with him. Play badly but at least put yourself about
  6. There is a difference between a lack of confidence and not trying.
  7. The players are the problem. Why would we appoint somebody they want? F them.
  8. It needs someone who is going to stamp their authority on this group of mentally weak and pathetic players. If they dont want to do what the manager says then freeze them out. No more putting arms around shoulders. Man up and play or spend the year in the U21s. On the Total Saints Podcasts they used the word 'cowards' for the players and that is what they are.
  9. He is so arrogant and full of hot air. The most annoying bit is the way he runs his hand through his hair during interviews.......gives me cold sweats
  10. Lets get Pardew back instead then 😂
  11. Yes I’m not sure why I thought that….
  12. Lets see what the final motive is. I suspected it was an Islamic radical to be honest based on the initial reports, which isnt really very surprising with recent history.
  13. They might realise that the first time he steps out from the reaction.
  14. Dave Challinor
  15. Basically he would need to become a better manager😆
  16. Great hair
  17. This is giving me shivers
  18. In my opinion, thats not a good enough reason for not intervening here and trying to destroy their structures to at least reduce their capacity to kill, rape and harm. It may not solve everything but it should make it much more difficult for them
  19. I don’t want to upset you but most politicians at senior levels do, even the ones you like. I can’t see what would be selfish about this though so when there is evidence I would be happy to agree with you. Until then it’s speculation
  20. It’s not speculative because he is starting to action it. If you read the article he’s putting political pressure so I’m crediting his work to date. Obviously if he doesn’t follow through then no. The use of the word speculation is based on something with little or no information or evidence
  21. At the moment I would personally take that to get some stability.
  22. Personally I think O’Neill would be a good shout
  23. Don’t give them ideas….
  24. If you look at the key politicians in the US they are Christian (the US is a Christian country obviously) and a lot of the Republican voting base is also. I think a lot of the discussion about the Nigerian involvement is related to that. The issue of the killing of Nigerian Christians has been circulating as a key matter in conservative groups for a number of months. Honestly I don’t know as much about what is happening in the Sudan but I understand that this is a mix of issues. I’m not personally saying that it wouldn’t be great to stop some of the utterly awful things happening there but the reasons for Trump to have to intervene may be different. I don’t think he will. Sudan has lots of natural resources and is politically much less stable so if he did get involved somebody could allege the same reasons you have in relation to Nigeria. In fact intervention in Sudan maybe easier politically and in terms of grabbing resource, if that was the aim. Therefore I wouldn’t say a lack of intervention in Sudan would prove he is getting involved in Nigeria for economic reasons if that makes sense i would like Trump to threaten military action on staple wood though if they don’t pull their fingers out😂
  25. I actually removed that comment as I agree with you in principle. However, there isn’t any evidence in relation to Nigeria. So what we agree is that he wouldn’t need military action if he wanted ti exploit energy resources. So why then is he not using other means of control in Nigeria to gain control of energy resources as we know he doesn’t want to get involved in boots on the ground. Instead it’s more likely that he is threatening a military stance to stop radicalised militants killing people as force is the only think those nut jobs will listen to
×
×
  • Create New...