Jump to content

Sir Ralph

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    1,254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sir Ralph

  1. Seriously xxx off redmond you waste of space. Mentally weak everytime
  2. Yes pretty good window overall - best for a while: Positives; Good money for Ings and reasonable for Jannik Got rid of Lemina, Gunn and Hoedt Armstrong looks like a decent striker for reasonable money Tino looks a steal We now have at least 2 players for each position - v important Negatives Could maybe have got a new keeper and got rid of Forster / McCarthy Would have been good to have a Romeu replacement We signed Walcott
  3. Agree like his attitude
  4. If he’s as good as people say he is I hope we are ready to offer him a new contract when he turns 18! This has been a pretty good transfer window to be fair to those in charge. We have lost Ings and Vestegaard and I’m still saying that so they must be doing something right. I get the feeling that this is the first year and Ralph and Seemens are less hamstrung by the unsellables and they are starting to show what they can do
  5. Is three years the maximum a 17 year old can sign?
  6. Seems like this guy is intended to be back up. That’s fine as long as we use our surplus funds for a LB and defensive midfielder. If Perraud or Romeu get injured we are in trouble. I think a lot of the problems we had last year was missing the holding player and physicality that Romeu has and we need to be able to replace that when he isn’t playing.
  7. Kid is great. Reminds me of SHAW at same age.
  8. Agree he is underrated- when did he last make an error that cost us? He’s only got one year left too
  9. Really good performance- better team against one of the the potential title contenders (albeit an outside one). Romeu, JWP, Stephens, Adams and Tino all good. Walcott was gash. maybe Ralph had clicked by changing things at half term.
  10. I had an email from the club confirming you can share a ticket when I asked the question. Think they would struggle to prosecute after that!
  11. maybe but still no excuse. There is a QR code option which also doesnt appear to work
  12. Ticket office manager should be fired. Completely incompetent.
  13. My initial reaction was Phillips would be a bad move. However, read this on the Liverpool Fans Forum - maybe we are underestimating him. https://forums.liverpoolfc.com/threads/404968-Nat-Phillips/page42 £15m would be too much
  14. If we finalise this, the window is starting to shape up for us. Sell Vestegaard, get replacement CB, back up LB and CM (the Ox). if we achieved this it would be the first season that Ralph mainly has players that he wants in his team which gives me more optimism. To date he has been working with a group of players, most of whom are not his aquistion.
  15. If Armstrong is our No1 target, this is pretty poor bearing in mind we have £28m for Ings. Need to pull something pretty special out of the bag if we are going to lose out on Armstrong over a couple of mill.
  16. Awful midfield play and defending 2-0
  17. If obafemi was part of any deal for Adam Armstrong he wouldn’t be playing today. Another indication he is off to palace. Would be hugely underwhelmed by sorloth.
  18. Well done Danny - got your champions league team then. Don’t make me laugh. He moved for £ and nothing else. overall not a bad deal for us if we reinvest in two decent strikers
  19. This Thread is the example of why kneeling is bad. People start kicking lumps out of each other. Bad idea PL
  20. .
  21. Waste of time will cause more division- link arms don’t kneel
  22. Sounds like a cracking deal from what people are saying about him. This is why we didnt sign Williams.......maybe using similar money to sign this guy full time instead.
  23. If anything if they lose grealish the pressure will be on the villa board to now complete the JWP deal
  24. Fair point
  25. Completely agree it was £38m in total (with £5m add ons). If we get dont get around the £50m mark we will have been caught with our pants down.
×
×
  • Create New...