Jump to content

AlexLaw76

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    14,138
  • Joined

Everything posted by AlexLaw76

  1. Yeah, that is exactly what they are doing 😐🤣
  2. He is a fucking lunatic. He had a point regarding the European defence stance/spending, but the jibes...fecking hell
  3. I have pretty much always said Starmer is playing this safe (and right). I have always been ver critical of our involvement in the ME.
  4. Usually I don't get all the running commentary regarding Trump, but he has gone insane regarding Iran. Our PM is doing the right thing and keeping us at arms length.
  5. UK War footing update. Not a f-ing clue
  6. It is, but they are also very powerful and good for other bits I do as a side hustle
  7. I wonder if that before or after the bedroom general went to jail?
  8. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    Crude oil extracted from the North Sea can be sent to exisiting refineries, though refining capacity has declined over the last 20 years (from ~16–17 million tonnes/year to ~9–10 million tonnes/year). For natural gas, North Sea gas is processed at terminals (e.g., St Fergus Gas Terminal) to remove impurities before being fed into the National Transmission System (NTS) for domestic distribution. The above restricted due to the reduction in the ability / capacity to store energy. The UK can use levers of Government to heavily influence where said resources are directed, via taxes, levies and maybe licensing conditions. Not my words......
  9. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    I said be more energy secure, not 'get energy security'...and yes, this could be done with the stuff the UK owns /claims in the North Sea (according to the UK Government anyway)
  10. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    Her Majesty has the exclusive right of searching and boring for and getting petroleum to which this section applies. (2)This section applies to petroleum (including petroleum in Crown land) which for the time being exists in its natural condition in strata in Great Britain or beneath the territorial sea adjacent to the United Kingdom. (3)For the purposes of subsection (2), “Crown land” means land which— (a)belongs to Her Majesty or the Duchy of Cornwall; (b)belongs to a government department; or (c)is held in trust for Her Majesty for the purposes of a government department. (4)Subsection (1) is subject to paragraph 4 of Schedule 3 and subsection (2) is subject to paragraph 5(3) of that Schedule.
  11. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    Yes, to enhance our own energy security and resilience. Domestic supply reduced reliance on imports (and cost of imports). T Instead of the current policy of almost banning licences, the UK could (probably should) invest in new technologies in the North Sea (or re-hash current stock). You blame Maggie, it was under Blair we (chose) to become Net Importers of gas, and created the the UK Climate Change Programme (leading to Net Zero), whilst They are all shit https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/securing-the-future-of-the-uk-north-sea-a-balanced-path-to-net-zero/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  12. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    Bantz mate
  13. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    yes, we could have. We could have maintained, or even developed the North Sea. As a nation the decision was made to reduce both the capacity and capability to exploit it.
  14. Fair point. Arsenal are away to Man City the weekend before No idea about champions league, assuming they get through
  15. It’s alright, Madueke has been better this season 😭😂
  16. Got to relish the challenge. Good to see either Liverpool or city will be out
  17. Arsenal have, by far, the deepest squad in the country. their 2nd 11 would challenge for the top 6
  18. The only worse fixture was Arsenal away
  19. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    The uk has decreased the capacity to refine energy from the North Sea, whilst not investing in the means shift to the resources plentiful from that part of the world it was a choice, and here we are.
  20. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    As I keep saying, security is not purely about price
  21. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    Kind of an assumption the country could when talking about not drawing down energy extraction from the North Sea.
  22. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    As said, security it is not just the cost, but you ignored that.
  23. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    But it would be a little cheaper, and/or less reliant on imports energy security is not solely about price
  24. He is our Iron Dome Israels No.1!!!
  25. AlexLaw76

    Iran

    In the name of energy security, closing down the capability, whilst buying it off Norway who extract it from the same place, should have been a consideration.
×
×
  • Create New...