-
Posts
15,684 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Weston Super Saint
-
Simple question for you @Matthew Le God, will England win tomorrow night?
-
You didn't answer previously, so what law(s) did he break? I'm right behind you on this one, 'if' he broke the law, then he should be subject to the consequences of breaking whatever law he broke - generally a fine or other penalty / prison sentence. Presumably you have knowledge of which law(s) he broke as you seem adamant that he did, but for some reason seem reticent to divulge this information....
-
Would also mean that there a no questions that shouldn't need to be answered because they are invalid as Matty has previous claimed
-
It deals exclusively with either knowledge or belief. It doesn't cover incidents where netiher a knowledge or belief has been developed, such as a new born baby.
-
Surely / logically they must be labelled the same as you labelled Trousers, i.e agnostic atheists? Pretty sure dogs have no idea if there is a god or not and spend zero time pondering whether they belive in one or the other!
-
Are dogs atheist?
-
Not sure that is strictly true. An Atheist : Surely, someone would need to understand the definition of what a god is in order to not believe in them? Otherwise you could claim that all dogs are atheist. All trees are atheist. All fish are atheist ad infinitum.
-
Really?
-
Schrodinger's baby?
-
Does a new born baby have a 'view' of anything, let alone the whether the existence of God is or isn't knowable?
-
Not at all, he broke the guidelines. Morally he has done the right thing. I'm more impressed that a politician has morals (or is able to pretend he does)!
-
The weekend riding thread.
Weston Super Saint replied to View From The Top's topic in General Sports
Fair pint 😲 -
The weekend riding thread.
Weston Super Saint replied to View From The Top's topic in General Sports
To be fair, the teams could potentially have a legitimate claim against the organisers depending on what is written in the t&c's they've all agreed and the safety of the participants. The organisers haven't got a hope in hell of suing the woman involved. She didn't buy a ticket, didn't agree to any t&c's, would not have received any sort of safety briefing. She was effectively a member of public standing on the side of a public road. More chance of a snowball surviving a heatwave! -
The weekend riding thread.
Weston Super Saint replied to View From The Top's topic in General Sports
She's made such an effort to get her position at the side of the road, created a beautiful sign from waste cardboard (truly doing her bit to save the planet) and then caused tens of thousands of pounds / euros worth of damage because she was more interested in watching the camera than the bike race! The state of some of the bikes in the aftermath I'm surprised no-one was more seriously injured! Apparently, the tour organisers are going to sue her! Great idea, not sure it will hold up in court, even if it did and they won, not sure they would recoup any losses!! -
Ah bless. You can't find anything that you claim I've made up about myself then. You must have made that up to win some points on the innernetz. Better luck next time sweetheart. Wide ups
-
Fucking weirdo. What have I made up about myself? You make a pretty shit stalker.
-
No need to print them, they sell them in these handy little books 😏 Fucking weirdo.
-
You're welcome 😏
-
Hahahaha fucking weirdo.
-
Keeping 'social distance' in the workplace (where he was photgraphed kissing the woman) is NOT a legal requirement but a recommendation : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57612441 The limit on households mixing is completely irrelevant. The incident happened between two colleagues whilst at work! (Although if I remember correctly, the rule stood at two different households meeting in doors at the beginning of May???) Police enforce rules and laws, they don't enforce guidance and recommendations. Hope this clears the matter up for you, but do shout if you're still struggling.
-
Rule and law breaking. Not 'guidance' breaking
-
I'm not desperate to think he hasn't broken the guidance. I do, however, understand the difference between laws, rules and guidance. Rule - speed limit = 30 MPH Guidance - please drive carefully Frankly, I couldn't give a flying fuck who he's been having an affair with. The fact that he 'apologised' is also completely meaningless, especially given he's a politician!
-
Nobody has asked the police to assist them in enforcing guidance. Stop being melodramatic. I've not seen any reports of police attending workplaces to make sure people are keeping six feet apart!