scumbag
Subscribed Users-
Posts
134 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
scumbag's Achievements
-
You would have thought that the first thing Dragan did was ask how many other times? Then destroy any evidence they can, and pay off anyone who might talk.
-
Nah. Double down, stick with, and wind up the puritans. Siege mentality. Maybe a couple of 73 hr 'observations' next season just for the lols. Sing about being evil cheats etc. and embrace it.
-
Indeed. Could of got someone from on here to do it. I've got far nicer jeans than Salty, so would have looked better in the pictures at least.
-
I think it might be because the underlying behaviour, from a morality perspective at least, surely remains the same - it was the behaviour that inspired the rule. And therefore it is mildly irritating to now be preached to by those that had a good laugh about it before (thinking of Mr Winter here and the just 'plant more trees' line).
-
St Mary’s Stadium will host Take That for two huge nights of The Circus Live Tour... The Saints board are presumably the support act.
-
They cant possibly have known about Oxford before Salt showed up. After all, we know that all Boro care about is the integrity of the game right? So they would have submitted any evidence to the EFL at that point for the good of the game, not after...
-
I think its perfectly possible to do the self loathing and sack everyone stuff alongside asking questions about how events unfolded both on the day and after.
-
-
The EFL submitted that a severe sporting sanction was appropriate, and that consideration should be given to expulsion of SFC from the EFL Championship Play-Offs along with financial penalties and points deductions. Lol, I bet they (boro) did! But still let both legs go ahead.
-
All the baying puritans below! They must live exceptionally upstanding private lives. I must be alone in recognising the sometimes flawed, morally bankrupt, individual looking back at me in the mirror each morning.
-
I think it's a case of reviewing the statements made by the team that lost (the same statements that called for expulsion in this instance), and then continuing to follow their demands accordingly.
-
No, not personally. It was all really funny apparently, and the same people raging against us thought that even a touchline ban was going too far.
-
-
Not a bad little insurance policy if they lost on the pitch was it?! Agreed, they played the outrage bit exceptionally well though.
-
In the absence of any new evidence, it seems the only thing we'll be arguing is proportionality. But the new panel will be in the exact same position as the last one on that - just making it up. That's probably our only hope really, some maverick crackpots up for some drama.
