Colinjb

De Ridder on for Connolly.

Sh*t. Daft goal to conceed. And yet again we look fragile at the start of the second half.

Free kick to the right of the Cardiff area. COME ON!!!

Is it just me finding it off-putting that Cardiff have a player called 'Kiss?'

May I be the first to say this half. Guly off and De Ridder on please.

COME ON!!!!!!!!!!! Not won away to Cardiff in 40 years, that's a duck that needs to be broken.

Absolutely THIS!!

My feel is that we are a little light in midfield, just like on Saturday, Bring on the Bald Inforcer.

Fonte treading a fine line.

Kenny Miller is everywhere.... And it's another cheap free kick for Cardiff on the edge of the area. Balls.

Who do they think we are!?

Rickie free kick............. .........Or Foxy? .............Fox, to back post but goal-kick.

Sh*te my spidey senses are tingling for a Cardiff goal... ...Please let me be wrong....

For me, it's more the thought of his loathesome father....

We play the kind of football he wants his teams to play..... if only he knew how.....

A mixture of fear/arrogance and melancholy.

The away end is in fine voice!

For starters, is there any way we can inform the club of this auction/check if it's on their radar?

Ok. We need to do something to make sure that item is associated with the club, not a random collector... Any ideas?

That is what is technically known as a 'rogering.'

He did in appearances for West Brom and Birmingham since he played for us. No doubt he did for Sunderland too.

It doesn't matter which party they are from, any career politician really shouldn't be in a position of power.

Just listening to a bit of this. This guy is head of the 'Labour' party, right?

No, it was in fact Crossley who scored that goal. The memories of seeing that go in from the away end at Hillsborough will stay with me forever. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dut-uGCO-8

The past gives you identity and foundation. The present sustains that past and is your reason to remain in existance. The future allows you to build on and aim to surpass what you are. The past should be respected but must not be your main focus. We must be building always to be as strong as we can possibly be right now with the view to a strong future, as such there is no absolute right or wrong in this argument.... but there is the risk of one side of the balance becoming too overbearing. My personal view has always been that we must be building to the future and be making all efforts to ensure that we are as strong as possible right now in order to allow it. This argument between Cortese and Le Tissier/McMenemy/Benali etc is a threat to our stability as it seems to be a war between the past wanting recognition/concession and the present needing to be resolute to avoid any potential ongoing abuse from parties which may not be as 'benign' in their motives as Le Tissier (for example). It needs to be sorted out, neither side must be 'removed' as they are all part of 'us.' Personally, I will always be more inclined to favour the building work towards the future at the expense of the glorification of the past. The prospect of us being back in the premiership or future cup runs, these possibilities fascinate me... and knowing we can be as strong as possible for these future campaigns excites me more then the nontheless still wonderful memories and glories we have from the past. It is only a sense of cautiousness from seeing how similar clubs have been consumed by these dreams (the Skates are the most ready example) that leads me to want the club to remain a little bound and grounded by past association. All sides to the argument have merit though, just personality and instinct provide the differential in the fanbase, it's a bloody nightmare.