Jump to content

Saint_clark

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    36,455
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Saint_clark

  • Birthday 16/02/1991

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Saint_clark's Achievements

  1. Don't get me wrong this is definitely organised by someone somewhere. I don't believe for a second that 60,000 people decided to hop the border on the same day because they saw a video on instagram saying Spain was open.
  2. That article is a piece of trash, but this is also a pretty poor take. The people who "broke into" Ceuta were misled and/or outright told they could easily get to mainland Europe. It shows how many would try in a very short space of time if they thought it was possible, and thats just from the closest African country with no conflict or major oppression. Once again, tens of thousands of men who are economic migrants trying to exploit what they see as weakness from Europe to allow them to live a "better life".
  3. Where do you think his first touch was supposed to go? To his left was a defender and right in front of him was the keeper. The only place he could go was to the keepers right, which is where he went. The second one did flick off the defender yes, but he still intended to cut back inside.
  4. Literally just making stuff up to criticise him. Everything he did in that was deliberate.
  5. I never tried it because I assumed the chemical would leave a stain?
  6. I'm guessing they're frantically redesigning the 2nd kit after the reaction to it? 😂
  7. Never tried it but I once read that if you rub nail polish remover on the inside of the shirt where the sponsor is stuck to the shirt, it dissolves the adhesive and you can just peel it away.
  8. Seeing as they removed it for some reason and I still had it open;
  9. Looking at the sanctions guidelines, the punishment is most likely to be a one match touchline ban and a fine (due to it being an admitted charge). Before anyone panics themselves by seeing the potential punishments for aggravated breaches, the criteria for it being aggravated is; "An aggravated breach of FA Rule E3 occurs when an individual uses improper, abusive, or insulting language or behavior that includes a reference to a protected characteristic. These characteristics include race, ethnic origin, nationality, color, religion, belief, gender, gender reassignment, sexual orientation, or disability"
  10. Sounds great to me. As in, there is so little there that you can't really draw an informed opinion either way.
  11. £200million easily. Morgan Rogers going for £117million FFS.
  12. I know he's been ill a while but that seemed to come out of the blue. RIP lad.
  13. They're not even trying to hide their corruption.
  14. Tuchel loses his job when we throw this away I reckon.
  15. Don't start this shit. Toney doesn't exactly fly like the wind, does he. Kane wasn't the issue against Argentina, it was the subs made that cost us any kind of forward outlet. Saka and Rashford should have come on and stayed up top, then Kane dropping deep could have looked for them on the counter.
×
×
  • Create New...