I agree, but the one thing that doesn't add up to me is that if this is a standard / routine case (in the FA's eyes) then why has it taken them almost a third of a year to come up with a verdict...? My gut instinct is, the longer they take the more punitive the punishment is likely to be....
That said, it could just be the FA are incompetent and/or inefficient at dealing with these type of cases, and it'll be a punishment that's proportionate to the 'standard' level of breach after all... Fingers crossed...