trousers

BBC News (UK) @BBCNews "It's not good enough to blame other parts of the world," Ed Balls warns George Osborne after gloomy economy figures bbc.in/y2fAh4

Bob Crow giving evidence to the Leveson enquiry at the moment. Good entertainment value... http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/house_of_commons/newsid_8167000/8167512.stm

You just know this trial is going to collapse before the end due to something coming out along the lines of a juror having not disclosed what team they support

Cloth for Trousers! Coffee on screen!!

Doh! Use of Twitter has been banned from the tax evasion trial of Harry Redknapp after a journalist named a juror on the social networking site. The same reporter, who is understood to be a staff journalist with Guardian News and Media, is believed to have also reported the evidence of a witness given under oath when the jury was not present.

Try it.... http://lew.io/headers.php

So, Salmond wants a "fair share" of all UK assets, like gold. I assume he would apply that philosophy consistently to other UK assets, such as oil fields for example....?

He actually mockingly calls him "Moses" in his introduction.... :-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akfN7bO_2Bc

James Pearce @Pearcesport We're going to hear from first witness now. HMRC... Hold tight.... James Pearce @Pearcesport A few football fans in court today. One gentleman was politely asked by court clerk to remove his thick woolly hat

AAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH !

For Pompey or companies that take more than a blind bit of notice of UK corporate law?

I'm fed up hearing about the potential forthcoming 'abuse' of the parachute payments scheme. It can't be right that these payments effectively encourage clubs to mismanage their finances. I'm off to do some research on the rules governing misappropriation of said funds.

I understand Paxman likened Salmond to Robert Mugabe on Newsnight last night. Didn't see it but sounds like quality entertainment!

"After a slow start to life in English football (not uncommon amongst new imports) many were questioning the reasoning behind signing him. He was even cited as part of the reason that Alan Pardew and Nicola Cortese had fallen out, many suggesting that Guly had been brought in by the chairman against the wishes of the manager and that he had to play whether Pardew liked it or not. Pardew’s decision to put Guly on the bench, in what proved to be his last game in charge at Bristol Rovers many suggested had been the final straw. This of course turned out to be nonsense, Guly was again on the bench for the five games following Pardew’s departure as Saints went on a disastrous run of form, and it was Guly as much as anyone that became a scapegoat amongst supporters."

Source?

I typically use the comparison sites to locate the best options then contact the hotel direct to get a better deal. As you say, you're highly unlikely to get a better deal by booking direct via a search site. It's one of the few remaining industries where you can haggle a price with the local manager without being fobbed off with "not company policy sir"

Anyone know yet how many CSI creditors have accepted the invite to next week's creditor's meeting? And is there any legal obligation to publish a list of declared creditors following that initial meeting?

In Pompey's case that 'scam' wouldn't need a fictitious invoice to work..,

Question..... The ultimate aim of a company whose business is the administering of other companies in financial difficulty is to make a profit for their own company. So, AA's job is to help UHY Hacker make a profit. As such, what is the ideal profit making scenario for an administrator? (a) to drag things out as long as possible in order to build up the biggest fee possible Or (b) to get the job done as quickly as possible, take your cut and move onto the next one It just seems like one of those perverse industries where there is (apparently) an incentive to do things as inefficiently as you can in order to make the most profit. Yours in curiosity....

Some would argue that they have already had an insolvency event by virtue of the 'fact' that CSI and PFC2010 have been acting as one economic entity to all intents and purposes (as has been laid bare by the 'coincidence' of PFC's finances going down the pan the second that the CSI plug was pulled)

@joshooiveld20: Just made the best word in scrabble I ever made: quiche (might be dutch) and on a very good spot haha #winner NIGHT all!

@joshooiveld20: Tomorrow I get the result, won't tell you guys though.. #noinfofortheenemy felt much better today already. #notworried

@joshooiveld20: Longest scan in history today, probably because I got the longest hammies ever. Hope for a good result, hammies are complicated injuries..

Call me a big softie but this just brought a lump to my throat....we have a pop at their fans for turning a blind eye to their conveyorbelt of dubious owners but the kids are none the wiser... @pn_neil_allen: RT @MrKimbell: @officialpompey I had my 8 yr old nephew on the phone in tears tonight. The people who have shafted #Pompey have no idea

So, reading between the lines of that PFC website statement, it seems pretty obvious that everyone (AA, CSI, Chainrai and PFC) was relying on siphoning funds from the sale of NOS / WRC Rights into PFC via the administration of CSI. If that's the care, are we looking at a huge miscalculation here by someone (Chainrai?) or just sheer bad luck? It would appear that the motorsport regulator (FSI) has played a blinder here...