Matthew Le God

Witch

All that does is support my point that he was below both of them in the pecking order for the two central midfield roles. Hence... 'back-up'. Romeu is the 3rd choice for those two roles.... 3rd choice = back-up

Romeu has been fine filling in. Wouldn't say he was one of the best performers since the restart and certainly not 'one of our best players'. In 2019/20 season he was below Ward-Prowse and Hojbjerg in the pecking order. Hence calling him... 'back-up'.

So you'd be happy with him first choice and no replacement signed (if Reed isn't used)? Yes he is a 'back up option' as he has been for most of his time at the club. Even this season he is below Ward-Prowse and Hojbjerg in the pecking order.

I'm intrigued to know how old you thought Hojbjerg is if you think he "probably only has a few years left"? Hojbjerg is only 24 years old! 😁 He also isn't really "covered by Romeu". Romeu is fine as a backup option, but I doubt Hasenhuttl will view him as a first choice player. A replacement will be needed, either with Harrison Reed joining the first team or a new signing like the rumoured target Weston McKennie.

Why would a business with hundreds of millions of turnover think a newspaper rumour would influence a multi million pound business transaction? They'd need to be extremely gullible to fall for that.

The religious books of the major religions claim they know about afterlives. Any evidence presented for afterlives can be reviewed now. None has been able to withstand scrutiny.

It being mentioned previously on the thread is irrelevant to it happening or if it would surprise me or not.

Howe replacing Hodgson at Palace wouldn't surprise me.

Earthworm Jim does not have his ear to the ground

Howe has had 4 successful seasons and 1 poor season in the Premier League and is still only 42 years old. That is more than Adkins has managed at 55 years old.

That is a nice new tangent for the thread to go off on. What can you tell me about the afterlife...? Is it possible to be sad in heaven?

I did not say 'temporary', I said 'temporal'. If you don't understand the meaning of the word temporal then I don't think this discussion will go anywhere. Although given the last 41 pages of this thread that is obvious! 😉😃

It is a clumsy ill-formed question. Existence is temporal.

Do we all believe in time? - I don't know what everyone on the planet thinks Can you be outside of time? - Existence by definition is temporal Is a watch proof? - That is a strange & flawed question

At no point did I say I believed it.

You did not ask if time exists in the first post. You asked in the first post... Do we all believe in time? Can you be outside of time? Is a watch proof? Those questions are flawed questions.

Why don't they count as saves?

I didn't pass comment on it. I merely posted it.

Puzzling why you don't see why evidence is important. I want to believe as many true things and as few false things as possible. We don't do that by blindly believing things to be true, that ends up in a delusional state that does not conform to the reality we live in and impacts on others.

Aren't his sources normally voices in his head?

Not really as it is a valid point. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so an old book is not sufficient evidence of miracles. You can't use a book to support the book, that is a circular argument!

30th June 2023