Jump to content

Matthew Le God

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    31,000
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matthew Le God

  1. I not seen enough of his teams play to really know. His CV is reasonably good relative to the place we find ourselves.
  2. I asked for exact. What in his job remit warrants his sacking?
  3. They recently hired an assistant sporting director to support Spors. But sporting director is not Bitcon's job.
  4. The sentence "Don't we now pay more in interest on the loan, despite refinancing for more favourable terms?" is phrased as a question, but it functions as a claim because it implies a specific assertion: that you are paying more in interest now, even though you refinanced under supposedly better conditions. This kind of rhetorical question carries an assumption or point of view, making it a claim disguised as a question.
  5. Although Coventry have recently refurbished, it is smaller and to a lower spec than Staplewood. No where near as much money invested into it.
  6. Saints have a better squad, better academy, better training ground, significantly bigger income next season, significantly bigger wage/transfer budget and bigger manager wage.
  7. You've made the claim, not me.
  8. I asked 'what exactly'. An example with evidence.
  9. 22 goals in 42 England games is better than 'pretty shit'.
  10. Everton announce Goodison will still be used for the women's team...
  11. What exactly has he personally done that warrants being sacked?
  12. Rick Wakeman's grandson has signed for the academy...
  13. Put me on your "ignore list" in the forum settings and you won't see my posts.
  14. Clearly, as people keep using them! 😉
  15. Strawman fallacy. At no point did I say it should be on the badge. All I did was respond to a post about famous ships connected to the city.
  16. A 40% pay rise does not restore wages to the same level after a 40% paycut. Joining on a free transfer does not mean you automatically get higher wages or that you'd be exempt from the standard relegation reduction clause the club used when signing other 1st team players.
  17. Why are you reading them then if it annoys you?
  18. Nonsense. It is a ship with a connection to the city. That is what the original post was about. It was not me saying I wanted a ship on the badge. Nor did I ever say Southampton was the only place that had a connection to the ship. Fallacy after fallacy from some on here!
  19. I was discussing. Internet forums are for discussing.
  20. Not accurate at all. I already explained why one point is bullshit and you haven't acknowledged it.
  21. The players will have automatic pay cuts after relegation. It was reported to be 40% last time, so the same again without the need to talk them into it.
  22. Bullshit. Strawman fallacy after strawman fallacy. You keep misrepresenting what I've said. For a start... at no point did I say the Mayflower or any ship should be on the badge. All I did was name another famous ship with connections to Southampton.
×
×
  • Create New...