krissyboy31

Would be surprised if Jaidi played 2 games in 3 days. Can see Seaborne coming back in for this one.

Don't know whether it's been mentioned before but there are some FAQ's answered on the OS. Not that it says much but might help a few. http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10280~1969536,00.html

That is how I understand it. It is a rip-off but a Wembley imposed one not a Saints one.

Think you'll find that it's a Wembley imposed booking fee and nothing to do with the participating clubs.

Plenty of questions, not many answers.

Apparently the PCFC board know nothing of SBT's intentions to resign and give away his shares. He texted this directly to the SSN reporter. LMFAO!

I hope that if they did this you WOULDN'T get a ticket! HTH (Being one of the part time mongs, that can only get to a dozen home games and 3 or 4 away games a season, despite being an ex season ticket holder for over 30 years).

If satisfied by the SoA they can withdraw the WUP but I don't think they have to go back to court. I presume the court case could still proceed if in the lawyers were still convinced they had been trading whilst insolvent?

I think that the only reason there would be a reinstatement (they wouldn't go back through the rounds) is if the FA decided that players like Quincy and O'Hara were signed in contravention of their rules (whilst insolvent) and therefore ineligible.

Probably think it's pointless walking away, in blind hope something will turn up. They'll all resign en mass on 28th February whilst on flights to the Cayman Islands.

He's still confident of a takeover in the next 24-48 hrs. Then tomorrow, the next 24-48 hrs and again and so on!

Because he's only been paying tax on the first £27k?

It was only, where it said "it's all Storrie's fault", changed to the Premier League's allegedly.

Lol! Shouldn't he be carrying a brown paper bag?

I heard Westw**d had melted down his bell as scrap and donated it to the club. That's an extra tenner in the income column.

But it all just stokes up HMRC's fire.

Apparently there were one or two things that PCFC wanted added to the report after they received it.

The reporter has spoken to Vantis and PCFC and the plan was to hand over at 2pm. It still hadn't happened at 2.30 and they spoke to Vantis just before 3 and they could not confirm that it had happened then.

I'm not sure that the High Court are so 'modern' with the way they do things. It probably has to be signed, countersigned and submitted in triplicate.

No, it's their report. They have to present it to the High Court.

Azougy was still there for the High Court hearing. Of course he was only a 'consultant' not an employee/Director.

It used to be more of a non-transfer window between end March to June 1st.

Or solvent, when anybody who knows anything about insolvency can see that they are blatantly not!

Don't think it will because it's still linked through your customer number.

The Sky reporter said he had asked Vantis why it was going so close to the wire and their reply was that these sort have reports usually take 3 weeks to prepare and they only had 7 days, so have been working around the clock.