What’s your point then? You’re denying the flood happened, “the world” in bible area and times is not the world as we know it in 2020. Parts of it were still undiscovered 300 years ago
MLGs biggest problem is he takes everything literally. “The world” in Noah’s day wasn’t the world as we know it today. The vast majority of it hadn’t even been discovered then.
Do you seriously believe it’s possible for a fish to become a human but it’s impossible for a Breed of fish that has lived in freshwater for thousands of years to evolve to only be able to survive in that type of water?
LOL so to say a man can evolve from a fish is perfectly reasonable but it’s completely impossible for a breed of fish to stay fish and just be able to live in the water they’ve lived in for the last hundred thousand years. Laughable
As I’ve already told you there is no evidence the flood water was salt and badger has already explained it to you. Yet again you don’t get it. for someone with a masters you’re not very bright are you
Why are you going onto me what raging bull believes that’s his choice nothing to do with me.
As for your other point you can’t prove how the fish survived. So you don’t know the answer. Game set and match.
Anyway, looks like i've won again today, 13 years undefeated. Yet another day of MLG mugging himself resorting to questions like "how did Kangeroos get to Australia?" It's the mindset of a 4 year old.
When you can prove the what the salination was of the water in the flood then we can have a discussion about it. Until then your post is irrelevant and you're making yourself look very arrogant and stupid.