Turkish

Or is it 3, simply pointing out the fact that behaviour of people refusing to accept a democratic vote aren’t fundamentally that different despite being on different “wings”. To accept that fact would be a tragedy for you.

Whereas in the UK it was the opposition trying to do it.

But it isn't apples and pears. Neither side accepted the result of a democratic vote. Both sides responded with aggressive behaviour, granted one was more severe than the other, but both sets of behaviours by both groups were caused by the same event. Failure to accept a democratic vote.

LOL - labelling me a right winger then saying i'll have a playground label for you. So why are you labelling me a right winger? I'm opposed to all violence regarding of what "wing" it us. Not sure how that possible makes me right wing. As for the women, that was just an example of a poor old leftie stamping their feet because she didn't get her way. Plenty of evidence of violence and clashes with police, but then i'm sure you know that already anyway, you just like to pretend that doesn't happen. I've attempted plenty of debate on this thread, yet it seems when presented with a few facts and a bit of evidence that actually lefties riot too and in fact when they have quite a few on here have been applauding the behaviour everyone becomes very quiet, lies or tries to change the subject, funny that.

Nearly 18 years ago, 'cking hell.

i'm not comparing the two. Plenty of examples of anti Tory protests leading to violence. I'm simply pointing out yet again some are quick to condemn this, yet quick to defend any "left" protests. Instead making justifications or excuses. This is how the fair minded left respond when they dont get their own way it seems Not My Prime Minister Woman - YouTube

I thought the general term we use is people letting off steam? How would you describe 4 years of trying to get a vote overturned that people didn't like?

Yes you did you liar!! You said, once you could finally bring yourself to admit there was violence, that we should stop concentrating on that and focus on the cause. You're a liar, a hypocrite and coward. Calling you and your bullsh1t out mate.

It was f*cking hilarious the way he first denied anything was happening (because he hadn't seen it reported in the Guardian!), then he said it was minimal, then put it down to right wing infiltration of the protests, then when all else failed we should stop worrying about the violence and vandalism and think about the great cause. Now got the neck to accuse hypo of supporting violence because that's what right wing people do. You cant make this sort of hypocritical behaviour up!

I dont disagree with any of what either of you had said, just in my mind i think it's less disruption to the team to move one player rather than two or three and also to play your best players in their best positions. JWP has been brilliant for the last year in his role, Dont disagree with Egg he could play the Armstrong role too but he really makes us tick in his role now. Either way It's a good problem to have, 3 very good players for two positions who all deserve to start

You're right, so we are in it's 20th year celebration, even more reason for Sky to talk about it.

You were supporting violent disorder last year. People in glass houses.

Why? He's be brilliant for the last season or so in his current role. If anything Diallo has shown, albeit in late sub appearances he can play a bit further forward effectively. Makes no sense to take one of our best and most influential players out of their position.

It will also mark 20 years and 37 days since the Swedish David Beckham announced his arrival in England with his first goals here in a 4-0 saints win at Filbert Street. Surely this will Get a mention.

I've been waiting for you to passionately deny there was any violence whatsoever and launch into a vigorous defence of their right to protest, like you have with previous riots/protests. Why haven't you yet?

Offended about what? I think all the protests that led to violence are shameful. Unlike some on here i dont care which "side" they are on.

Started well but went down hill.

Im not talking about those that were there, i'm talking about those on here and in the media who seem to be cheerleaders for any "left wing" protest, yet incandescent with rage at any "right wing" protests.

Read the various threads on here, then you'll see why. Plenty couldn't bring themselves to admit that any the "left wing" stuff was wrong.

Presumably then, you dont support the actions of the BLM protestors who attacked the gates and Police officers at Downing Street?

Both resulted in widespread disorder. Plus there were plenty of protests here about people not liking election results, all fine in some peoples eyes.

Agreed. Funny how all the lot who were cheering some of the other protests are now all over this condemning it, even inventing hypothetical situations where if it was someone else the policing would have been much more heavy handed and more people would have been shot. Of course it's not objective, it's the frigging Guardian. The same source that quite a few on here were quoting to prove there BLM protests with large scale disorder had no disorder whatsoever.

Nothing to see here pal! Dont focus on the violence, focus on the cause!!

The Guardian, that voice of reason. The same paper that claims going for walks in the countryside is racist 🤣🤣🤣

There was hardly any violence, arson, looting and vandalism, we all know that, those that did were right wingers trying to disrupt the peaceful protests!