View From The Top

If it's good news then pfc will release a statement today telling the world how the arabs have saved the club.

Easy to knife.

S13sfc

HQ was fun.

Now read again what I said. The debate was about super strength lagers and ciders that don't get sold in pubs are usually have a % of at least 7. Not ordinary lagers, even though they are cr@p and only drunk by women and poofs.* Tennants Super is a decent example of one. *cold bottles of Becks during the summer are excluded.

Or any other country that has introduced it. It's a great law as smokers are selfish scum. I'm an ex-smoker. :smt083

5Live had a debate about super strength beers and lagers the other day and one proposal, from CAMRA was that all the ****ty super strength beers and ciders, much beloved by sweaties, should be heavily taxed and real beer, up to 4.5% - 5% should have their duty cut. In addition, booze sold for home consumption should be more heavily taxed and booze sold in pubs should be less heavily taxed, thus encouraging people back into pubs. What say you all?

Sorry about jumping out, little 'un woke up and was calling for daddy.

So it's not an act.

A good team playing HQ in Scapyard or the like would be 'kin awesome.

Read the thread and my views are clear.

Check out the thread in games, we are online most nights.

Are you really that thick or is it just a good act?

5 is not a good killstreak. :cool:

I have a college laptop that I do all of my college work on and my own laptop, with it's own dongle thingy, that I use for my own use and my community teaching. None of my colleagues take their work laptops home and none use them in situ for non work related stuff apart from web based mail etc.

because them there teachers don't use their laptops for anything else and the high speed broadband is just sat dormant as it's never used.

If there is enough interest I'll host a game tonight at 20.30.

Since changing my style of play, from my MW1 gung ho approach to a more considered and sneeky style I've upped my ratio from .45 to .85 and that's between ranks 40 to 66. My accuracy is still around 14%. for those who haven't added me it's staffs_saints.

Ed Balls was on 5Live Breakfast Show this morning to talk about it and the decision to launch it nationally after the success of the pilots so it's hardly new news. Whilst, like most of us I guess, I applaud the idea of giving opportunities to some of the poorest children in society it does strike me as a colossal waste of money. A couple of years ago we were awarded some cash to get some new laptops. The preferred supplier wanted £xx per machine. There was no way I was going to spend what they asked so I got better spec'd, at 1/2 the cost machines from ebuyer instead.

'kin crazy idea. Lard arse, work shy chav parents will hardly employ the technology as it's attended. Upside I guess is there will be plenty of extra slappers on Plenty Of Fish etc for those inclinded to use such sites.

What a polite way of saying that they are thick.

Travelling back in time to a mythical golden age.

No, you don't. You just like to pretend you do as you're PV'd and act like Billy Big ******s. Junior ratings on HM Submarines are not privy to the machinations of Choundrys group of the workings of MI5. You are not the only person on here who has worn a uniform and knows who things work.

Where as you simply advocate inaction. I would suggest you go and look at what a full disclosure, along with the safeguarding agency, covers. Also look at why it was introduced. Nothing is foolproof but I'd sooner we tried than hark back to some mythical golden time when the establishment considered kids fair game.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, everything was much better in the days of boys in shorts, doffing your cap and rationing. So, we do nothing to at least try and protect kids? Perhaps you prefer the approach the Catholic church in Ireland used to take to the issue of child protection?