Badger

And don’t forget 1966, which helped set the tone of the relationship between the teams.Alf Ramsey describing them as “animals” I think we played them in a ‘friendly’ 1976 or 77, two players sent off after one of them smacked Trevor Cherry (one of those sent off) in the mouth.

Can’t see Luton affording his wages if we can’t

Not good timing to hold a minutes silence for Rattin perhaps. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cwy09z3qlppo

Today's offereing:

I thought they were on a five year deal. Not that it matters too much as I think Hummel were also, but dropped after two. As were Adidas. Presumably both contracts ended due to non-performance in getting stock to the club.

The only thing wrong there in my view is the hideous sponsor logo. I’m not keen on the gold inserts but could live with something similar in ours if we got the basics right. At least they got the back right, It can be done.

If Sheffield Utd were having to sell I’d be interested in their LB, Burrows. Although this is unlikely if we’ve got both Manning and Wellington with us. No recent mention of the Wellington going back to Brazil rumour

Watch the cunt blast one in against us though

Agree. Certainly like the white shoulders and sleeve. As you say reminiscent of 2011/12

No. Other clubs have managed without.

Is there a similar restriction on an Argentinian ref if they’ve got any there for an England game? Breaking news : West Germany want 1966 to be replayed due to potential bias of a Russian linesman.

Sounds like the format for a reality tv show. And to really get the public attention, teams have a joker to play on any decision . The trick being not to use it too early in the tournament.

Hummel would get my vote. They seem to create more bespoke and individual offerings than the bigger names

Could be a follicle of truth in this

According a press report on Teeside that's because he's behind the camera.