Raging Bull

Me

I understand perfectly thanks. I looked at both sides of the coin and have decided there can be only 1 winner. Because at the end of the day you either believe in creation or evolution, there is no other choice. Here's a little something from Scientist David Rosevear who made an insightful observation about the way evolutionists apply a double standard. He wrote the following: In 1990 the Hubble Telescope was launched into orbit and began to send back pictures to earth from space. One of the declared aims of the project was to look for other planets outside our solar system, and to try to find extra-terrestrial life. How are we to recognize signs of life? We must look for coded messages by scanning the sky at various frequencies to try to pick up intelligent signals. The signals would have a non-random sequence (a design) and would carry information. Design and information are recognized as the product of intelligent life. Yet here on earth we look at the simplest cell, with its incredible miniaturized design and information, and wonder if it could somehow have arisen by chance! The reason for this double standard is that scientists, like other mortals, look for evidence which will support their philosophical world-view. If life has evolved on earth by chance, then surely it has evolved in many other places in this vast universe. While it is recognized that intelligent life-forms would send non-random messages, it is not accepted that non-random sequences in genetic material here on earth can only be the product of an intelligent Designer. Evolutionism is not so much a science, more a philosophical world-view, with all the dogmatic assertions of religion (David Rosevear, Creation Science, Chichester, England: New Wine Press, 1991, p. 20). Not to mention the charlatan Darwin who recognised the problems his theory had with the evidence. Indeed, there were two particular things bothering him were. They were (1) the fossil record, and (2) complicated organisms, such as the eye, that seemed to show design. To this day, these problems continue to plague the theory of evolution.

The very same Wikipedia that anyone can alter to suit their own viewpoint Oh the beautiful irony Hang on a minute, I can feel something underfoot. Nope my bad, it’s just MLG rearranging the goalposts again

And where would that big bang have come from? What/who would have made the parts that went into the big bang?

It takes even more faith to believe in the big bang horse sh*t than it does to believe in a divine creator

Where have I said that? I simply said you have to ask Christ into your life to get to heaven. Yet another own goal...

Why? Are you gonna be there?

:lol: I’ll leave this for you again http://educatingourworld.com/index.php/coming-books Plenty of answers for you

Heavy mob Have you not noticed MLG constantly dragging stuff on and on and skipping questions?

He’s asking for people to do one simple thing

Accept he actually has to believe in and ask Christ into his life first. I pray that 1 day he does.

Whilst running the risk of carrying this on, how on earth have you come to this conclusion? I get that you hate God but don’t let that cloud your judgement

This is by far the best thing he could do (when they’re open again). If there’s a Calvary Chapel in his area he should go there. He won’t though

And this is it in a nutshell. I, like you can accept that someone has a differing viewpoint on the issue and am prepared to leave it at that. MLG cannot accept this, or admit he’s wrong This was made clear (again) after I eventually answered his question on the flood, and he instantly moved the goalposts to a different part of the bible without any recognition that his question had been answered and what he initially believed was right, turned out to be wrong.

Classic westie

Political

To be honest the question has already been answered. It’s not my fault if you can’t Understand it.

No not at all, just don’t have the time or inclination to answer every single brain fart

WWJD??

God, obvs. It's just the place where armies/leaders come together and get ready to rumble, but it doesn't happen. Christ annihilates them as they get ready to fight against him because by then the entire world will know he's coming back.

Would you rather he simply controlled everything and didn't give us any choice? Armageddon is just a place, there will be no battle. That's a Hollywood thing

I’m waisting my time here and have better things to do. The very fact that you’ve changed from the flood to exodus shows you’re somewhat desperate and even when you’ve had the answer pointed out to you, you still won’t accept it. I come back to something I said a few months ago. We all live by rules. Back in Noah’s day they all had rules. Noah and his family were the only ones to stick to them. Back then they ALL would have known about Gods rules. They chose to disobey them.

And by the way, your question about Adam and Eve is also massively off track. The very fact God gave them the free will to choose shows just how kind he is. If he didn’t give them the opportunity to choose then he’d have been no different to the dictators of this world. Just as you’ve got the choice and free will to believe, or not

1&2 answered in Gen 6:4 3. No 4. If he didn’t do this then the world would have been an incredibly different place you wouldn’t have the opportunity to sit behind your keyboard for hours on end questioning what a kind and loving God has actually done for you.

Ok duckie, here’s a very short answer to the flood. The “people” drowned in the flood weren’t “real” people as we know them today. And what I mean by “real” is that they weren’t entirely human. They’d been mixing with other things. Therefore God didn’t murder a planet of “innocent” people, as you’re constantly so keen to keep dropping into this thread. But then again you’ve read the bible so you’d know that already. Oh, hang on you clearly haven’t and are lying... To save you the time duckie, Go to Genesis 6 for the answer.