Raging Bull

Why, so we can go to and fro for ever? no thanks

You know exactly what I meant

Killing someone is not the same as murder. To murder someone is an unlawful act. Americans kill people in the electric chair all the time after a lawful ruling. It’s not difficult to understand. Go for a walk and clear your head, fella. It seems to be getting to you today

The 10 commandments also say to honour parents so where’s the contradiction? And just so you’re aware (even though I’m sure you’ll bring this up again later in the year), it was, as I’ve already pointed out a few times and you’ve ignored, for a people group who would have ALL known and ALL understood Gods rules.

Back to this 1 again commandment #5 “Thou shalt not kill.” "right lads grab the goalposts, we're on the move again"

:mcinnes: & one for luck

Me

I understand perfectly thanks. I looked at both sides of the coin and have decided there can be only 1 winner. Because at the end of the day you either believe in creation or evolution, there is no other choice. Here's a little something from Scientist David Rosevear who made an insightful observation about the way evolutionists apply a double standard. He wrote the following: In 1990 the Hubble Telescope was launched into orbit and began to send back pictures to earth from space. One of the declared aims of the project was to look for other planets outside our solar system, and to try to find extra-terrestrial life. How are we to recognize signs of life? We must look for coded messages by scanning the sky at various frequencies to try to pick up intelligent signals. The signals would have a non-random sequence (a design) and would carry information. Design and information are recognized as the product of intelligent life. Yet here on earth we look at the simplest cell, with its incredible miniaturized design and information, and wonder if it could somehow have arisen by chance! The reason for this double standard is that scientists, like other mortals, look for evidence which will support their philosophical world-view. If life has evolved on earth by chance, then surely it has evolved in many other places in this vast universe. While it is recognized that intelligent life-forms would send non-random messages, it is not accepted that non-random sequences in genetic material here on earth can only be the product of an intelligent Designer. Evolutionism is not so much a science, more a philosophical world-view, with all the dogmatic assertions of religion (David Rosevear, Creation Science, Chichester, England: New Wine Press, 1991, p. 20). Not to mention the charlatan Darwin who recognised the problems his theory had with the evidence. Indeed, there were two particular things bothering him were. They were (1) the fossil record, and (2) complicated organisms, such as the eye, that seemed to show design. To this day, these problems continue to plague the theory of evolution.

The very same Wikipedia that anyone can alter to suit their own viewpoint Oh the beautiful irony Hang on a minute, I can feel something underfoot. Nope my bad, it’s just MLG rearranging the goalposts again

And where would that big bang have come from? What/who would have made the parts that went into the big bang?

It takes even more faith to believe in the big bang horse sh*t than it does to believe in a divine creator

Where have I said that? I simply said you have to ask Christ into your life to get to heaven. Yet another own goal...

Why? Are you gonna be there?

:lol: I’ll leave this for you again http://educatingourworld.com/index.php/coming-books Plenty of answers for you

Heavy mob Have you not noticed MLG constantly dragging stuff on and on and skipping questions?

He’s asking for people to do one simple thing

Accept he actually has to believe in and ask Christ into his life first. I pray that 1 day he does.

Whilst running the risk of carrying this on, how on earth have you come to this conclusion? I get that you hate God but don’t let that cloud your judgement

This is by far the best thing he could do (when they’re open again). If there’s a Calvary Chapel in his area he should go there. He won’t though

And this is it in a nutshell. I, like you can accept that someone has a differing viewpoint on the issue and am prepared to leave it at that. MLG cannot accept this, or admit he’s wrong This was made clear (again) after I eventually answered his question on the flood, and he instantly moved the goalposts to a different part of the bible without any recognition that his question had been answered and what he initially believed was right, turned out to be wrong.

Classic westie

Political

To be honest the question has already been answered. It’s not my fault if you can’t Understand it.

No not at all, just don’t have the time or inclination to answer every single brain fart

WWJD??