shurlock

Result!! Especially as yoshida's been enjoying an extended run in the team, the player you've consistently mocked and dismissed as a liability, if not utter garbage. SOG #bundleofcontradictons

Love the made-up assertions that Fonte is declining and Yoshida is now better than Fonte.

7/10. #brexitbingo

He does a mean shepherds pie.

He wasn't going backwards. Typical helmet revisionism/sour grapes that is a hallmark of this place. He didn't have a preseason, so needed time to get up to speed (Cedric was worse for exactly the same reason). But on the whole I didn't notice any real drop off in his play.

You're going to be dining on this for years pal.

9.1/10 Don't forget its mandatory to cite the upper range of any transfer fee, except of course when we're buying. Only saints do good deals; the rest of the football world are suckers.

Yes I do. What's your point? Funding pressures in the NHS are requiring other parts of the system e.g. social care to do more of the heavy lifting.

Surrey County Council has obviously not been paying attention.

Their point holds in a first-order sense, forcing you to make fictitious claims and putting words in the authors mouths i.e. migrants spend all their money here. Where do they claim this? Frankly the issue of remittances is hugely complex, even simply evidencing it is fraught, never mind working out the economic welfare benefits. Indeed the question is rarely, if ever framed in the way you have done, outside the feverish minds of kippers and the Express. Why not focus on the meat of the paper which is the impact of immigration on local jobs, wages and public services? It's no shsme if you have nothing to say on it - after all, in your own words, you're not an expert.

Is it true you had a Twitter meltdown and lobbied to be allowed back on here and Glasgow was investigated by the OB?

Country trade audits? I even heard Liam Fox downloaded some Lonely Planets to his kindle.

Wonder how McQueen would do in one of the shuttler roles. He's versatile enough: shown he has a good engine, can defend and be disciplined and pull out wide and get forward.

Redmond did his best to overhit the pass and long to miss it.

Ignore? Don't be salty GM. What are you going to do when the UK and US consummate their special relationship in a glorious, mutually beneficial free-trade deal -all in record time?

You can take profits before the day is out, as I have done (slightly over 1% against the $). If I need advice on horse**** and fertiliser, I'll know where to come. Stick to what you know, little kipper.

Today's the 18th pal. That chart only goes as far as the 17th. Can you count or read, little kipper?

Candy from a baby with this lot and they try so hard to please

The Express article also cites the World Bank and you're now in the habit of rounding down figure - are you sure you're not telling porkies? To repeat, the headline statement is correct (never mind you're unable to establish, even using official data how much EU migrants send home). Keep ploughing away Baldrick.

Pounds down today - some quick trading profits already realised. Thanks for asking. Re. free trade. You misconstrue my point: I said the next president, whether Clinton and Trump, would not be a natural ally of free trade. As such the situation would be more complicated than blithely assumed. That's true. I didn't say a deal with the UK wouldn't happen. Please show where I've done so or wind your neck in little kipper. Of course, it's all dribble and hot air till it happens and whether we can judge whether it's good for the UK. No matter how many times you try or how many lols you include, you're not anymore correct

Watch your heart, old boy, you're working yourself in a frenzy. Back on planet earth: http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2017/01/on-brexit-over-optimism.html

Thanks for this pal - time to short the pound again thanks to more gratuitous f**kwittery by the chuckle brothers, davo and bojo.

Baldrick, we're pals. We both know you did a sloppy Google search and are citing a dodgy Express article given the figures are in £ (2015 prices). http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/585860/Foreign-aid-British-Migrants-11bn-other-countries-year Thank you for massively qualifying your original statement - yes the figure covers both EU, non-EU migrants and critically the diaspora-not trivial as countries like India, Nigeria and to a lesser extent Pakistan overwhelmingly account for flows. Guess those distinctions don't matter to your average kipper #globalbritain. That said, I'm still struggling to see how you reached £11bn given the UK only sent $11.5bn in 2014. It does make more sense if, however, you included the remittances the UK received ($5bn); but that runs counter to the point you're trying to make. Oooopps.

So you agree with the headline statement? Can you also point me to those World Bank numbers.

Which issues are those and where is it wrong? Stick to specifics pal. The 'declaration' is because helmets like yourself can only resort to smear and discredit organisations by pointing to EU funding. The Press Complaints Commission has already forced newspapers who've made similar baseless allegations to publish withdrawals and apologise. There is no basis in fact for them, little kipper.