EastleighSoulBoy

No, but hopefully some foolish institution will pay you your life's earnings against you continuing to work. After all, they are yours. It's just that you haven't received them as yet. I have to admire your sense of humour fella! It will sustain you through what I feel are the difficult times to come.

Priceless horsesh!t. I reckon, at 54 years of age, that I will earn (at my current rate) some 500k before I retire. That is my money, I just haven't received it yet. Any bets on whether my employer would advance me that sum? I'll turn up every day guv, honest, f'sure! Oh! but how will I live for the next 12 years after spending that sum on rare soul records?

Ok, thanks but it prompts this line of thought (one which I posted a few days ago). What if? What if Poopey actually manage to gain promotion back to the PL in their first season? What happens to the parachute payment due to them (but already taken!) for their second season in that case? I was given to understand that if a PL club bounces straight back up that the second payment is shared among the CCC clubs? If that's the case what happens next?

All this talk of the PL 'protecting the brand' makes me wonder at what stage their action will reach it's watershed and tip from propping PCFC up to cutting them totally adrift to be at the mercy of the legal eagles? In other words, when will they wake up and smell the rotting fish?

Currently, but in the past, at two characters longer, we had:

No she!te Sherlock!

You keep this rich vein of form going and I'll fall in love with you.

Kerching! Was that the sound of a penny finally dropping?

I would think that should the HMRC be successful (perlease!) then they will seek to close all possible loopholes or avenues of escape, procrastination and prevarication by urging for the WUO hearing to be A.S.A.P. Let's hope that the Judiciary see it that way also!

No but Riquelme has been seen at Gunwharf Quay with SKY cameras in tow.

:smt103:smt103:smt103:smt103

I'll get my lawyers on to you!

I'm fully expecting that at some stage in the proceedings the PCFC lawyers will ask the judge for an adjournment so that Mr Story can invite the HMRC to 'step outside for a chat about things'.

Have we not been pointing this out, with ridicule, since the inception of this thread? Mirror scoops from Saintsweb shocker! You really couldn't make it up.

I'd settle for 2. that would make my day after watching that buffoon and his pals on their day out to Burnley. The whole attitude permeates the club from owner(s) right down to fanbase " I got fazzzands a pands of det but I gotta follow pompee" (TCWTB) Probably the only innocents are the staff such as the tea lady etc.

Second photo, nice to see the late Stevie Mills in the background. R.I.P. Stevie.

Agreed, did not mean you personally. The administrator seems to have been influenced by the Storrie teller's spin.

Still the same. CBA now. Sorry.

Love it! Now on FB.

Now you are clutching at straws Mero! 'due diligence'! Who on earth, in the last few years at Nottarf, has exercised due diligence? Sorry mate, but you owe me for a new keyboard as mine is drowned in tea! Oh! of course! We're back to blaming the PL again. FAPP. You couldn't make it up. Really.

Sorry for my ignorance, what is 'Pre-pack' and how does that affect the creditors and benefit the club? Is it akin to liquidation?

Although I agree with you I don't think our case would hold water as the PL works under a different set of rules from the FL and this would be the main line of defence in any court case.

There are some error(s). Please see each marked section below. Which factors have not met the expectations you had when you signed up. Please tick all the factors that apply This is a required question. Please select at least one item below to continue. (SRES_002) price per month / package contract length equipment provided usage allowance speed (upstream/downstream connectivity) customer service reliability of service brand reputation convenience / bundled service webspace If I'm totally happy with my service how on earth can I honestly answer this question and, therefore, complete the survey? This survey is obviously flawed or, more cynically, is canted so that the person completing the survey either contradicts themselves or lies. NOT COMPLETED :smt070:smt103:smt103:smt103:smt103

More suitable?

Thanks to my mate who put it on FB