dune

Why not?

OK, i'm gonna let you become my financial adviser. Please bombard me with PM's and i'll bore the **** out of you in return. I have a dead serious plan - i'm going to turn 1000 pounds into a Million in 5 years 6 months, do you want in?

Make no mistake, the cuts will weaken the fleet (and that is bad because I still hark for days when the royal navy ruled the waves and no-one gave us any **** because they knew we'd blast the **** out of them and kick their asses) but at least we have a Conservative governemt that like me has imperialist yearnings, so if the Argies everinvade the flklands you can rest assured we would take them back and nothing would ever stop that. We would find a way and we would be victorious.

May I answer please?

I think they are sad when used excessively, and I really don't like the loling one anymore because it's like a gormlous lol - like you wouldn't expect at all from RobskII, but I do think the rolly eyes is an improvement on the old "tripping your tits off" rolley eyed model. As for the others I cannot at present think of any I like (but may well do when i've finnished writing this and access them - in fact i'll go advanced and do it now.... this one aint too bad sometimes and this one is good when i'm bigging my coolness up The rest are really gay.

They are most dangerous when confused. You might be walking down the road and in the distance spy a lanky ginger person acting erratically and he might confuse you for a tree. Do you really want that?

I'm going to have stop giving you serious and honest replies because you are clearly too delicate to handle them. In future i'll pull your leg and draw out that legendary sense of humour of yours.

n.b when I say gay i mean happy, and therefore sad. Discuss.

Now you're just being silly. We have tree huggers for that. Behave yourself.

Mr X I have recently been rearching the traits of the homosexual man and woman in my studies of Charles Darwin and the magic lamp. What is ypur opinion on the Socialist debt mountain and are you a giver or a taker?

Who rattled your cage you geriatric worzel.

I think we all share your concerns matey.

share price?

It's a mugs game so I'm really shocked you would suggest it. That's like Delldays pretending to be the most boring man on the forum - utterly unbelieveable!

I once had a fag hag come up to me in a club and enquire whether I was interested in her gay friend. I was well chuffed because gay men have really discerning taste in other men, so gave me a huge ego boost. Mr X let me send you a pic and you can tell whether you'd **** me.

Having a Nuclear capability is essential because it gives us a seat at the worlds top table.

JLT - You're just a normal unretarded fan so you're bound to feel this way. TSF unfortunetaly is a mong magnet for all of hampshires village idiots.

I was just scrolling down the thread thinking "the mong hasn't posted" and then you had.

Verbal correct me if i'm wrong, but it's more likely that you are dimwit than George Osbourne.

Uranium - I think that's shrewd. Ping me the name of the company please mate and i'll take a lot at their stats and do some reading on them and then i'll assess the stability of where they are digging. I am so tempted to really pump some dosh in a Rhodesian company (the one i mentioned) (and yeah my heart is thinking - so i'm slowly debating with myself on it - because Cecil Rhodes and Ian Smith are my life hero's and role models so i'd love to be involved with a Rhodesia firm) but it is very very risky. I have so far began a dialogue with firms Maidstone office and am trying to covertly glean the info I want with the tactic that rarely fails - FLATTERY - and if you want i'll share the info with you so YOU CAN DECIDE.

Mate i'm dyslexic. I hope you feel proud for basically calling me a mong. I now know how Mr X feels and I bet you'd have preffered it if i'd been terminated in womb. I'm so tempted to report you for your Spazist intollerence, but that'd make my like 1976 Child who isn't a real Spaz, but does a cracking impersonation of one. Delldays however isn't Spazzy at all and I dunno why I just thought of him too.

Before investing in mining you need to know what they mine and what it means in relation to your projection for the future. With economies recovering I think there is still some mileage in gold (but it's had it's big rise so is it worth it?) and then you have to consider the inpending construction crash in China (what minerals go into construction?). I have long been watching silver and still it follows gold, but one day (maybe soon, probably not soon) it will break away from gold and realise it's true value as not only a precious metal - but as natures most efficient conductive metal. Silver therefore hasn't had it's day and it will one day be a very valuable industrial material due to the forementioned properties but that said I think those with an interest in silver maybe can afford to hold bak as I think it'll fall back with Gold before we finally see the link broken.

You are simply wrong about that Wade. By the very fact 60% of their GDP is inconstruction they are vulnerable. They will crash in the short to medium term.

No abuse for me Mr Garrett, you disapoint me, or could it be that you are finally absorbing the edutorial (if this isn't a real word it should be) lessons from myself and my junior apprentice (in intellect but not age but ceratinly on charm and charisma) Jonny Bognor?

We are now almost at the point where the seeds are sewn in Britains long road to recovery, and it has long been my view that we need to cut back hard and fast so as to get this country back where we belong on the top table of global powers. I was critical of George Osborne in the run up to the election, and would have much prefered KEN CLARKE - THE MAN WHO LAYED THE FOUNDATIONS FOR BROWN - which created the miracle of a Socialist government remaining in power so long, but I have to say that since the coalition came into being, and the more i've heard from George Osborne, he absolutely spot on with his assessments of where we are and where we need to go. I particularly admire his steadfastness and resolve to make really tough decisions and aside from my reservations about cutting the fleet and its related hardware (this should be avioded at all costs IMO) no area should be ringfenced, and if I was GO I would certainly be looking to target the NHS more than is likely. I do value the NHS and credit where it is due to the Socialists they did the right thing in putting it back on its feet, but I am firmly of the belief that there is a great deal of waste in the NHS (GP's ridiculous high salaries for e.g) that can and should be tackled. There has been concern about the effect of swingeing cuts on the wider economy, and as a nation the private sector isn't yet as confident as i'd like, but just like when I predicted the recession two years before it happened, I do do forsee strength in the private sector and some of our largest companies are sitting on huge amounts of capital and are waiting to invest in increasing their capacity. BT for example have cut back on jobs even recently, but they are sitting on a proverbial mountain of gold just waiting to unleash their high speed broadband technology, and our manufacturing base (although sadly not a patch on it's glory days) is outperforming all the non Germanic European states. The pound is likely to remain weak for at least another 5 years so we have every reason to feel bullish and this is exactly the attitude I expect from business leaders. Todays joint letter from some of Britains most illustrious business leaders further strengthens my view that Britain has now past "rock bottom" and the only way is up! There is however a cloud on the horizon, and at this stage (not yet had time to digest and analyse this to form my viewin its entireity) i'm unsure of how it'll affect us. China. It may come as a surprise to you all, but China Exports have gone from 12% to 3% of the GDP. I am surprised on two counts 1) I would have thought the peak figure would've been greater, and 2) The drop is huge. But this is not the real problem for China - the real problem for them is that construction accounts for 60% of their GDP. To put this into context construction accounts for 17% of UK/US GDP and just look at the affect this relatively small (in relation to Chinas) sectr had when the subprime market went belly up. So what does this mean for China? It means very real danger, and despite the seemingly unstoppable growth I prefer to look at it like a diver climing a another rung of the diving boards ladder. Trust me, sooner or later China is going to CRASH BIG TIME - just like the Asian Tiger nations did in the 90's when their GDPs were so dangerously out of kilter in favour of construction. The only difference is that Construction as %age of GDP in the said Asiatic tigers was 40% - remember that in China it is a whopping 60%!! So where does this leave the UK and the West in general - well unfortunately on face value not in a great position because the effect of China bombing with be a weaking of an already weak Yuan, but in my view we can weather that and in the long it'll be for the best because we would all be far better off with China back where belongs sleeping. Remember Napoleons famous words - "let China sleep for when she wakes the world will tremble" - well she awoke in our generation and we are trembling, so only a fool would not welcome a sedative.