Verbal

Interesting comment about WHam by Martin Samuel in today's Times: "They simply sold too many players in the summer, with the defence in particular weak and slow. Even if West Ham do go up, apart from Bowen and a handful of promising youngsters, there is barely a player worth keeping." So much for the "best squad in the league"?

In which case you'll see him every week outside the club shop asking to get his shirt name spelt correctly.

It didn't really come to my mind TBH because it would mean his absence from all future games. In terms of form we'd now be second, and already in the autos. In terms of points we're only three off second and a faltering Swansea.. Doesn't seem that miraculous to me, especially as we're not even into November yet.

Saw that, and have decided to chalk his goal off.

As that well-known equation goes: Delusion + Hope/Gloom = Sainstweb/Wrong

This may sound like good advice, but it does go against the first principle of, eg, the Karma Sutra FWIW.

Crikey

That's the one

Trump appointee and head idiot of the FBI Kash Patel has the most spectacular answer to this question. He doesn't want to "discriminate against the victims of bestiality" when hiring FBI agents. By definition, of course, the "victims of bestiality" are animals.

I think you're underestimating Tonda's ability to switch from spliff-happy to Stygian gloom in about 0.00001 of a second.

One thing I can not quite get my head around: if spying is such an offence that it's considered reasonable to penalise a club for potentially £100m+, and damage the career of a manager, why isn't the practice simply outlawed? What makes it a gargantuan crime to spy within the last three days before a game, but completely fine and dandy on the fourth day before a game?

Mods, can this be the motto in the Saintsweb masthead?

Quoting this only after checking that I hadn't made some dumbass-in-hindsight comment on page 1.

Smarty pants

And you're shit?