whelk

Islamists are a Labour issue that they don’t understand but other parties do. Not a problem before July 2024?

What makes you say that?

Have you noticed the little runt Mason wants/needs to be in every shot? Don’t just show the politician being asked his question he must be on screen asking. Also using camera angle to make him tower over them like the 5ft 1in colossus he is. Oh, and yes Sarwar is a massive cunt.

I will look later but am actually away this weekend so probably won’t be soon

I can’t think of a news story less interesting as what Trump thinks of Chagos. Don’t understand why being discussed as does any one truly give a shit?

Obsessed with paedos. No one else seems to mention as much as you

Just to let you all know, having a huge penis can sometimes be a burden

You are both decent posters

As an aside I don’t get the anger towards Sir Ralph. He has some differing views to me but nothing that riles.

0.9% GDP growth predicted by BofE for next year. Staggering to have this despite all the Marxist legislation passed. Maybe Ralph’s mates are just shit at their jobs and should settle for something less demanding more suited to their skills?

As Egg says the knives are out. This in isolation isn’t much of a thing….to me. A shot appointment but only an Ambassador

Fucking naive to think this is exceptional stuff. Don’t disagree shit judgment but the average Joe won’t care much

Have you got your sandwich board out decrying the greatest scandal the world has ever known yet?

My missus just said she didn’t understand why everyone is making such a thing over this, has she missed something? Obviously the desperate to be outraged will but I generally couldn’t give a fuck either.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Epstein bankrolled the Maidstone lunches.

It absolutely speaks to a lack of judgement - that is far preferable to corrupt. I’ve made a few posts saying same thing- doesn’t matter who is in govt, they carry the can for so much discontent and not as powerful to change people’s lives as much as people think, or hope.

I can’t speak for others - it’s my opinion. However If you collated every Telegraph and Mail headline since the election, 90% would be complaining about Labour - It’s ideological. Same with so many bots- they want anger and discontent and are at it 24/7 - you still seem to frequent the cesspit that is X and I can only imagine the amount of misinformation swilling around. I am being 100% honest in that this scandal hasn’t outraged me, and that is absolutely nothing towards any blind loyalty to Starmer and co

I have to be honest it hasn’t resonated much with me. Never liked or trusted Mandelson. The amount of people linked with Epstein is huge and no doubt so much corruption and insider dealings that go on at the level. Just don’t get the outrage but then I am not reading commentators telling me to be. It’s like some are only just aware of Epstein- fck me been a story for years.

You’d get on like a house on fire with Sir Ralph. Endlessly posting smearing rumours caveats with ‘if true’ about rent boys, affairs etc. Your MO is always to deny having an agenda but your desperation for failure is palpable. You are an intelligent lad but fear you are being unbalanced due to your idealogical opposition

lol - recency bias I think

Not really although I have been avoiding the news, stopped listening to political podcasts as all too depressing. I don’t think Starmer should resign. He’s been a disappointment though.

Thick cunt

Although there is going to be free transport for families who have children with cancer. McSweeney above himself it would seem. Mandelson was always dodgy - like Savile you just look at them and know they are a wrong ‘un. Starmer’s judgement clearly off. To the average voter it is still about making their own life better off so don’t think Mandelson impacts but all more ammo against them wanting moral high ground.

One of his own

Door bell adverts