Sorry to sound like a broken record but my internal evaluation on the entire situation continues to focus on the grey areas surrounding the 72 hour ban.
Apologies if I’ve misread but the stories surrounding Middlesbrough claiming they have evidence of Southampton spying on other clubs never seem to mention if this is outside the 72 hour period. If “spying” is allowed, and we’ve done it but adhered to the rules, then why the giant outcry?
All speculation and my own views but this must be more widespread across the football world. The fact there isn’t a blanket ban on spying and has caveats instead will absolutely see clubs try and push it as far as they can. I bet Boro do it in some capacity. This is why, in my opinion, we’re not seeing other clubs come out against us. It’s too easy to become implicated. I fail to see the act of “spying” on other teams to gain an advantage is some genius, novel idea thought up by our analysts. It has to have been learned.