Unbelievable Jeff

I love you keyboard warriors acting all hard on a faceless football forum...:lol:

What do you mean WTF? You asked what that word meant, I'm showing you. Just put the word into Google.

Well, I said this when talking about the difference between Hughes and Pellegrino - everyone said that it was due to MP being ****. Now Hughes is struggling it seems people are prepared to look at that possibility - but MP is still **** apparently.

Absolutely would not stop until he is sacked, and for a bit of time after that when we bring in someone who then does a better job.

I wish he was mediocre - I could live with that.

I'm not, but I think we'll go down anyway. We'd be better off with Puel I would think, so it's just the last 2 appointments that have been stupidly bad.

No. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Mong

What makes you think that? Classy use of that word BTW, let's hope you never have to deal with a disability in your lifetime.

I'm just wondering why people are so quick to defend Hughes, and to want to give him time, when he has all but wasted 5 winnable games. Do we recognise that the team is no better and get rid now, or wait until we've played a number of hard games and get rid around Christmas. Crystal Palace were very clever last season in recognising that they were going to struggle with De Boer and sacked him early. We equally as soft (or even more so) at the back than with Pellegrino, maybe a bit better attacking wise but certainly not pulling up any trees. Personally, I am just willing to recognise this earlier as I have never rated him, call it confirmation bias or whatever you like, but it doesn't mean that I am wrong.

Good point, well articulated. Also, dickhead is all one word. HTH.

The points the bottom three picked up in their last 10 games was the least since we went to 3 teams being relegated from the Prem, or something like that.

No, I'm saying that you cannot count on those goals as they tend to be the exception, not the rule.

Cheers buddy!

Because my last thread was still open then - but I've had to create a new one as that one was locked for some reason.

I also think the girls we have actually scored seem to be on the lucky side, stunners from Hoj and Bertrand that you can't count on, a breakaway last minute goal by Hoj, a penalty etc. We don't seem to be scoring many where we've just broken a team down and been creative.

I'd swap him for Puel, and at least we defended well under Pellegrino. Defences win Championships (and also probably keep teams up).

We stayed up yes. Not sure whether I would say it was due to him or whether it was due to the other teams around us being so bad. But yes, he was at the helm when we stayed up.

And of those wins, 1 was against a Palace team that haven't got a point in the last 2 years when playing without Zaha, and an utterly appalling Swansea team. But hey, what do I know - I certainly didn't predict it when he was appointed...

Has it worn off, or are we just following what happened when he first came in last season? I don't think he's actually had any positive effect - even in keeping us up we were still poor. It just seems that this season is an extension of that.

Tonight was definitely not a good point.

5 points...

Might have to start another "Hughes Out" thread...

One of this that's I'll is Russian though - such a weird coincidence.

Why can't they organise a day trip? They did a reccy on Saturday, did the deed on Sunday and went straight back to Russia. They got in and out months before we even knew it could have been them? What if the Kremlin WANTS it to be obvious they did it, as a threat to other Russian spies around the world? What an easy way to do it. Russia has been brazenly annexing countries, flying bombers and fighters into no-fly zones and defending the use of chemical weapons by Assad. Why would they give a flying **** about this?

You do know that putting evidence into the public domain severely diminishes the ability to prosecute, don't you?