Jump to content

sadoldgit

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    17,993
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

50,390 profile views

sadoldgit's Achievements

  1. I am not quite sure what you are on but you clearly shouldn’t have any more. Even nutty nic makes more sense! I assume when you say “stage broadcaster” you actually mean state? The BBC (not Been) is independent of the government, or is supposed to be. It is not a state broadcaster. It is a public service broadcaster. They are very different things.
  2. Not really, I am only repeating what I have read and what I have heard. This was the first article talking about the issues Trump would have to overcome to win. Given that he won the election, he will have a problem in proving that a programme that want broadcast in the USA damaged his reputation. A reputation that is already severely tarnished by the way. He is doing what he always does. The same old bullying tactics of throwing huge numbers at people to force them to settle. The New York Times are standing up to him, so should the BBC. It is not as if he didn’t say those words and he has to prove that the programme acted with malice. They could argue that they had just reduced his very long speech to the salient points and no malice was intended. The fact that he was actually indicted for insurrection will also play against him. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c709y1yx1r0o.amp https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2025/11/12/would-trumps-1bn-lawsuit-against-the-bbc-hold-up-in-court
  3. Strangely, there are still some left here.
  4. The legal experts they have wheeled out so far say that he is unlikely to win the case, so why settle?
  5. I would be a hoot to see him awarded $1.00 damages with no costs. Given that he defames himself on a daily basis it’s hard to see how he can make a case though. Perhaps those people in America who don’t wear red caps should sue him every time he tells them lies?
  6. sadoldgit

    Israel

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwykze63r2xo.amp
  7. Children In Need have raised £45.5 million so far. If Trump had his way that money and more would be in his bank account.
  8. Perhaps the plan is to bring Bree back?
  9. The u turn would be implementing an income tax rise in the budget when they said in the manifesto that they would not. As Egg says, if they say they will not increase income tax in the manifesto and don’t, that is being true to their pledge.
  10. Short memories some people have. It is almost as if the governments of Cameron,Johnson/Cummings, May and Truss weren’t an utter shambles. And these people think that Farage would be better!!! Jesus wept.
  11. Should age be an issue? Fabian Hürzeler is doing ok at Brighton and he is 32.
  12. I love it when the MAGA disciples use TDS as a response. Just like Trump himself, they can’t face the truth or give a meaningful defence of his behaviour, hence deflection and obfuscation. You don’t make “accurate and valid points.” You avoid questions, you don’t understand points put to you and you post utter gibberish. For example, why bring up Tony Blair when asked a question about Donald Trump, his sexual activity with young girls and close association with convicted peadophile?
  13. Will he play off the shoulder of Long John Silver?
  14. Yes, it is unrealistic to hope that a manager of his pedigree would come to us when he will have far better job opportunities come his way.
  15. How long before a certain prolific poster comes on saying that he is and has only been the true ITK poster on here?
×
×
  • Create New...