sadoldgit

Tall Paul on form. https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/25880026.former-southampton-striker-cant-stop-scoring-turkey/?dicbo=v2-euK5owx

I thought this was a joke but apparently he is flogging these watches ((only $499) on the Fox channel ! https://gettrumpwatches.com/products/fight-fight-fight-red?srsltid=AfmBOoqpwRrHDBelluij78Gv541nsZIZZIJrbLN4_6aiJ1WxJUUn-uuM

Until the next draw or loss. Still, how awful is the QPR away kit?

Being convicted means being found guilty of a crime. Sexual assault is a crime. He was found guilty of sexual assault by a jury. The rest is semantics. The simple fact is that he was found guilty of committing a sexual offence by a jury in a court.

I have never claimed let alone “boasted” that I personally used to prosecute sex offenders. That is the job of the prosecutors. I worked in the support team. Try and get your facts right. He was found guilty of committing a sexual offence and therefore he is a convicted sexual offender. It’s not hard to understand and I don’t get your obsession with trying to pretend otherwise.

Got to be happy with that. They made it easy for us but there was still a job to do and we got it done. I’ve given Stephens plenty of stick over the years so I’m pleased to be able to say that he has actually been solid and looked the part during this unbeaten run. Fair play to Captain Jack (and please keep it up).

Another Trump apologist crawls from under a rock. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/10/trump-trial-verdict-white-house-2024-run As explained several times, the only thing they couldn’t agree on is whether she had been penetrated digitally or by his penis. I think most people understand that equals a sexual offence and therefore he is a sexual offender. As also explained many times, there are states in the US that consider both digital and penile penetration as rape. Those states would consider Trump a rapist despite not being able to determine what he used for penetration. Weird that someone still can’t understand that it is ok to call a convicted sexual offender a sexual offender. Plenty of other allegations too along with this guilty verdict. https://19thnews.org/2023/10/donald-trump-associates-sexual-misconduct-allegations/

Yeah but, yeah but…. We are talking about Trump, you giant wankpuffin. The President of the United States of America. The most powerful man on the planet who is currently using his position to bully the world and his own country whilst trousering billions of dollars. The man who is already a convicted sex offender and has many other cases outstanding. But, again, you deflect. Engage your brain for a change. It is entirely possible for Trump and Epstein to have had a falling out. That doesn’t preclude them previously having a close relation, which is exactly what happened. Think. The fact that they turned on each other has nothing to do with what happened earlier. It really isn’t hard to understand, or shouldn’t be for someone with your self proclaimed massive intellect. Trump is not just guilty because he is all over the Epstein files. If you can look at what is going on on a daily basis and not see it, it makes you just as complicit in his abuse of power as the others in the MAGA cult. People like you are the reason we have the likes of Trump, Farage and Brexit. Ignorant to the point that these people can stand there, show you exactly who they are, yet you still support them. Your ignorance has been demonstrated on a daily basis on here since you joined, yet you still think that you are the only one who “gets it.” A typical conspiracy theory sucker who thinks that you are brighter than the rest because, to you, 2 + 2 = anything other than 4. Trump’s numerous appearances in the Epstein files are just further pieces in his dodgy behaviour jigsaw. Only people with a Trump is innocent derangement syndrome will throw in names of those who have nothing to do with what Trump is up to as evidence that Trump is innocent of any wrongdoing. You are the Saints Web’s version of Pam Bondi. I know it all goes over your head. Perhaps you will understand this. Every one of your posts should be followed by this emoji. 🤪 Have a good day.

Can you imagine if someone turned up on your doorstep and said that they were entitled to your house because it says so in a dusty old book? I’m thinking of starting a religion which says I am entitled to Cornwall.

Oh dear, you are not only having a good week, you are not having a good decade. I said that Epstein was rumoured to be living in Tel Aviv. You really should have finished primary school and learnt to read English. No, explain to me why I would hate her more if she were living in Tel Aviv please. What difference does it make as to where she is? Where in any of these threads do you condemn Trump and Epstein, sex abusers in the Church? You only attack sex abusers if they have a different colour skin or are Muslim. If they are white, not a peep from you. Off you go and play Leader Of The Gang on the jukebox with your young friends.

Says the man that can’t condemn genocide and grades women according to how many pints he would need to drink in order to have sex with them. If you think trying to put something into context is a problem you really shouldn’t spend your time here. Ask yourself this, if it had been anyone else charged with being in possession of indecent images of children, would the BBC have run it as the main story for the best part of a week? They usually drop things further down the pecking order as the story progresses unless there is a new and major development. It smacks of the BBC trying to overcompensate because it was one of their own. Now you can disagree with that if you like, but spare me the faux outrage because I think that his crime did not warrant being the lead story for so long.

1. Factually there is plenty of factual evidence on this forum of me condemning any Muslim attacks. 2. Whites do it more? It is factually correct that “whites” commit more sexual assaults on women in this country. I make the point because people like you only focus on those who commit sexual assaults who have dark skins or are Muslim. 3. Provide evidence that I protect everything that Muslims do and hate everything whites do or STFU. 4. You, nutty nic, are the disturbed one. By some measure you are the most deluded, ignorant, blinkered, paedo supporting, far right apologist on here. Congratulations, that takes some doing. I’ll say it again as you don’t seem to get it. I have zero tolerance for any extremists/terrorists who target innocent people no matter who they are. I worked in London at the height of the IRA bombing campaign and more recently was only a few hundreds yards away from the terror attack on London Bridge. All of the perpetrators no matter what their skin colour, religion or motive, can rot in hell as far as I am concerned. Oh, and by the way, a vile person is someone who posts laughing emojis under posts about the deaths of innocent people and supports paedophiles. Little wonder you have ended up in Thailand.

Who said that she was living in Tel Aviv? Can’t you read plain English? Why would that be a reason for me to hate her? Why don’t you have a problem with paedophiles? Another day, another dumb post.

Every few weeks you make exactly the same claim and every few weeks you are just as wrong and deluded as you were before. Do you get off on making yourself look stupid on a daily basis?

I assume you are referring to my comment about Hew Edwards as that is the only time I used that phrase. It was based on the fact that the BBC had run the story as the main feature several nights in a row. It seemed like overkill given that it wasn’t actually the crime of the century and probably wasn’t the biggest news story every day of that week. For a bit of perspective - put these three crimes in order of seriousness (hint, two of them are always tried in a Crown Court due to the level of seriousness). Found in possession of indecent pictures of children. Rape. Murder. Another clue. As far as we know, Edwards did not rape or murder anyone.