The FA has decided that Tonda has done enough to bring the game into disrupt. If it is down to him, why did the EFL find the club guilty and punish the club? It seems to me that either one or the other is responsible, not both. They are getting two bites of the cherry. The EFL have gone after the club with a disproportionate punishment and the FA look like they could do the same with Tonda. Two lots of punishment for one crime for which two separate bodies have been held responsible for. How does that work in the cause of justice?