sadoldgit

It has been said that it is widespread, whether it is or not, who knows? It could be that it goes on and isn’t a big deal amongst the clubs generally so perhaps he thought it wasn’t a major problem? Given that it is widespread abroad, it isn’t unreasonable for him not to worry about the consequences here. I think we can be absolutely certain that he wouldn’t have done it if he knew the end result here!

There is indeed. It is just as well that they don’t add an appropriate smell to their paint. We have Elephant’s Breath on our kitchen table legs.

We have that on our lounge ceiling.

Perhaps they should make Tonda stand behind the nearest tree and communicate with the coaching staff via an old iPhone on match days for the length of his ban?

At least it is not as poncy as something from the Farrow & Ball colour chart, like Badger Spunk.

Every country should, but go for it Norway!

Putting Eckert’s integrity,or lack of, to one side, if you banned everyone in professional football who lacks integrity there wouldn’t be much football being played each week.

Perhaps they chose not to sack him because, like a great many people, they didn’t feel that this was a big deal and has been blown out of all proportion?

He did, a lot, and defended his actions strongly in public. Spying wasn’t against the EFL rules at the time but he was still in breach of the rules of proper conduct.

It’s retro though, hence the V neck.

As was throwing us out of the competition though. Nothing would surprise me to be honest.

What type of women have you dated?

He has got cheat stamped on his CV for ever and is responsible for a football club being removed from a football match which has cost them millions. Don’t you think living with that isn’t a punishment? If he gets a personal punishment, why then punish the club too if the fault is his alone? If you get a speeding fine the responsibility is yours alone. If I remember correctly only Leeds were held accountable not the manager (although he paid the fine himself).

You are making a huge assumption here. SR aren’t mugs. They will know what the possible outcomes are. Any company makes contingency plans for worst case scenarios and it is not SR’s fault that the FA have taken so long to deal with this matter.

The FA has decided that Tonda has done enough to bring the game into disrupt. If it is down to him, why did the EFL find the club guilty and punish the club? It seems to me that either one or the other is responsible, not both. They are getting two bites of the cherry. The EFL have gone after the club with a disproportionate punishment and the FA look like they could do the same with Tonda. Two lots of punishment for one crime for which two separate bodies have been held responsible for. How does that work in the cause of justice?