bpsaint

https://news.sky.com/story/asylum-seekers-warned-not-to-make-kissing-sounds-at-people-in-new-guidance-about-living-in-uk-13574744 Handing out leaflets now telling them not to rape women. Diversity is our strength.

Illegally working on shared courier profiles whilst living in government funded accommodation as “asylum seekers” whilst still being paid their allowance from our taxes. There’s plenty of articles online about it.

And what handouts do you think they’d get if they tried claiming asylum in a nearby Muslim country instead of heading to Europe out of curiousity?

I’m sure the same charities handing out sims will be handing out handsets too. Or they can buy one with their free money.

“meaning the charities are free to distribute them to anyone in the UK who would benefit from six months of free data, calls and texts, according to the Telegraph. Mr Yusuf told GB News: "British people are rightly outraged that a company of the size and scale of Vodafone is handing out SIM cards to military-aged men who they know are breaking into Britain. That is precisely what Vodafone have been doing." Free phones/free sim, same shit - either way another freebie that adds to their sweet life at our expense.

Getting paid to sit around all day and do fuck all whilst not having to want for anything? Yeah I’d say they’ve got it pretty sweet whilst the rest of us have go to work and pay towards their stay.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/08/13/free-vodafone-sim-cards-channel-migrants/

So 3 square meals a day, a roof over their head, free mobile phones and clothing, that’s assuming they don’t “vanish” as so many do and go get jobs working for front companies like Deliveroo, and yet there’s plenty of Brits struggling to make ends meet. Dress it up how you want but they’re living the sweet life at our expense.

What do these changes mean? These changes affect people who apply for British citizenship after 10 February 2025, if they arrived in the UK without entry clearance, or if they made a ‘dangerous’ journey, no matter how long they have lived in the UK. The guidance explains that a ‘dangerous’ journey means travel by boat or in a lorry, but does not include travel on a commercial airline. https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/98-of-channel-boat-migrants-have-no-passport/ Can’t do a background check on a known terrorist if they have no proof of ID. Then they get to live it up at our expense whilst their asylum claim is processed. Pretty clear it’s what they do yet only the fools deny it.

When they throw their passports overboard and claim to be fleeing persecution as they’re gay they’ll soon be given asylum to the uk, live on state handouts at our expense, and vote for the party that gave it to them.

Why don’t they seek refuge in their nearest country? There’s plenty of Muslim countries they could seek refuge in, why not go there? Why head to the west, a way of life they absolutely hate so they want to turn it into one of their shitholes when they arrive. They head to Europe because we’re an easy target, and they know they can exploit the systems when they arrive. Poland has the right idea, don’t see why us as an island nation find it so hard to curb the invasion. Unless as mentioned because it’s entirely by design. More boats = more votes.

Funding the illegal crossings into Europe, particularly across the Mediterranean and the Channel. Funding the professional protesters that we see from the left constantly. Not to mention the funding for Islamic centres across Europe that Qatar are paying for. Look at the giant mosque that’s being built in France, the islamification of the west right before our eyes.

Farage is a cunt. Zia Yusuf however speaks a lot of sense.

Qatar and Russia mostly, grander plan to destabilise Europe from within.

Some of the most crime ridden and corrupt nations in the world, many of which are on the UK Government red list of places not to travel. Brilliant, let’s welcome them all in what could go wrong.