The nic Thread

[east-stand-nic]

On 04/03/2026 at 02:09, Gloucester Saint said:

Never thought I’d praise Tucker Carlson but I’ll make an exception - he called it spot on, Trump is bonkers following Mad Ben headlong into Israel’s conflict.

If it doesn’t blow us all up first, silver lining is it will finish MAGA off if the Epstein files don’t get there first (Quelle Surprise the distraction from those, and Trump). Even he’s having to warn the red hatted numbskulls of higher petrol prices for a while and that’s on top of his horrific economic tableau of tariffs and high inflation. 

A perfect example of cognitive dissonance. You never agree with Carlson, but now you praise him ONLY because he said something that suits your opinion or the narative. Amazing childlike views and ways. 

[east-stand-nic]

I see the libard left are out protesting the attacks on Iran, but where were they protesting against the Iranian regime mowing down their own in cars and shooting them on site in the street?

Similar to those who protested against attacking Hitler in 1939. Leave Hitler alone. Leave the Iranian supreme leader alone. Utter nutters who are clearly deranged and confused. 

Good god, there are even libtards out there protesting with banners to say stop the terrorism act now,. What is wrong with you all?

Edited 10 hours ago by east-stand-nic

[sadoldgit]

Another day, another new low for the forum’s greatest intellect who doesn’t seem to understand that two things can be true at the same time. Nic, go find an English speaker to explain the word ‘nuance’ to you.

 

[tdmickey3]

19 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

A perfect example of cognitive dissonance. You never agree with Carlson, but now you praise him ONLY because he said something that suits your opinion or the narative. Amazing childlike views and ways. 

Woof woof

[sadoldgit]

So nic, do you think that we should follow and adhere to the laws, or only when it suits our purpose?

[badgerx16]

15 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

So nic, do you think that we should follow and adhere to the laws, or only when it suits our purpose?

Nc would probably vote "Restore" seeing as they don't think being British is defined by "beliving in a set of abstract corporate style values like democracy and the rule of Law. "

[revolution saint]

1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said:

A perfect example of cognitive dissonance. You never agree with Carlson, but now you praise him ONLY because he said something that suits your opinion or the narative. Amazing childlike views and ways. 

I'm really not sure I follow your logic here and it doesn't make any sense.  Are you saying Gloucester should disagree with Carlson on everything because he generally disagrees on most things?  Surely that's just silly and tribal? 

 

[badgerx16]

The irony of Nic talking of posters' "amazing childlike views".