JohnnyFartPants

It was. From you, it always is.

Thanks.

Be clever, not get clever. "Clever" isn't something you can locate and bring to a location.

My point exactly. I can't see why people cannot allow themselves to think that they would be pleased if we climbed the table now under Wotte and had what looked like a healthy and positive summer to mull things over. Just saying things like, "It won't happen so not worth considering" is a childish response and seems more in line with their hopes than anything else.

Mate, if you think that is your only mistake in this sentence then it speaks volumes.

I don't get that. That would make it in the interests of anyone who is a major shareholder in a business to run it badly to gain full control? Can someone explain how this works please? I would have thought there would be rules in place against this.

A far easier way to ensure "tit" status would be to write a sentence like your last one. When you read it do you know what you were trying to say?

Do you get the impression that some people would rather he failed in order to have more ammunition against the current board? I mean, "the board" for all it means could be made up of Peter Sutcliffe and Jade Goody for all I cared. If it suddenly stopped being bad and suddenly became good I for one haven't got the time to sit and berate them for their historic mistakes. They have made a change and time will tell if it works, not a nerd on a forum making pessimistic posts.

How dare you take a positive from a story you Lowe Luvvie.

Is the interview still floating around?

:smt054

No disrespect meant and sorry that he died but I have never heard of him.

I don't think so. It's there in black and white to see exactly what I said. Perhaps in your haste you misread a word in a sentence of mine?

Not really. I reasoned that we were in recession and further had a **** product. A "double wammy" of reasons why even in a pile of **** we would look the more like ****. Oh, and we do.

Well "the trend" would be that all markets are down by some degree. I stated that we are not bucking it, in that we are not up when the market is down, plus we have a crap product which will have an effect. Why are you arguing that I have said what you are stating as if I haven't?

Could you elaborate on this?

Helps? It more than helps. It is complete confirmation. They ARE both lower. Many thanks.

The solution to our (not Wilde's) problem has been solved.

First Skacel and now Rudi. Where will this end?

They both look down on three months ago to me, despite the patter.

The clue might be in the length of this "trend" you speak of.

I will grow the grass then divide the field with a fence to ensure equal greenery. Is that okay?

It's a sh1t product in a recession. It's not surprising or bucking the trend is it?

That is up to you, would you like there to be?