O.K. It is quite simple. If a player has a bad game then feel free to say so. There isn`t a player born who doesn`t have bad games. I just think that to just say that a player is completely **** all of the time, when that player has scored 11 goals and been credited with many assists in what is going to be (hopefully) a promotion season says more about the people who critisise than it does about the player concerned. I am not saying that Guly is brilliant, but I think that this continual slagging of a player who quite obviously does have something to offer (NA keeps picking him) is nothing short of pathetic. It is not just about opinions. If I said that MLT was a fat useless git who offered nothing to the team, would that just be accepted as my opinion? Or would I be pilloried as a lunatic? You can`t have it both ways.