sotonjoe

Especially as the verdict isn't being appealed

Ignore

Hardly. We've probably been watching them train all week.

Source? And don't say Noel Edmonds.

Yeh it's nuts. If they're separate competitions and separate punishments, expulsion from a competition for one count is a much harsher punishment than future four point deviation for two counts. Can't see that as justifiable or proportionate

Gotcha. Cheers. I see these people obviously have some legal pedigree so the reported Talk sport comment where they claimed the original panel were more sporting experts rather than legal experts wasn't really accurate. 👍

We hired shit spies

This bit interesting from the BBC 6 days ago .... "The EFL has asked for an expedited hearing to accommodate next Saturday's final while Southampton have argued they need time for an internal review." So initial hearing was expedited against Southampton's request. Would presumably be something significant to lean into at appeal.

Thank you. So who said it was sport resolutions handling original hearing and who reported the identities of individuals appointed to the panel by sport resolutions? Not challenging it but I'm compiling my own records as I have nothing better to do EDIT I can see BBC reported sport resolutions appointed

Which website? I'd like to look it up 👍

I see .. where was that reported then?

I'm wondering if the people representing each side were barristers but the adjudicators are just professional adjudicators (whatever that means).

As you say it's already a complete farce. On current plans they've got Boro putting tickets on sale on Thursday for a game on Saturday, pending outcome of.an appeal on wednesday.

The eft statement acknowledged that Southampton's appeal ruling could mean further changes made to the fixture

Good plan

Good plan

No playoffs then

No playoffs then

No playoffs then

No playoffs then

No playoffs then

No playoffs then

No playoffs then

No playoffs then

No playoffs then