Jump to content

saintjay77

Members
  • Posts

    4,370
  • Joined

Everything posted by saintjay77

  1. cheers for the effort but that site has been locked down for a while now and requires a username n password.
  2. 2nd half started yet?
  3. I didnt realise how quickly I could go off someone until I read that post.
  4. If that wasnt true is would be funny
  5. im down this way so ill step in and do the job for him if he likes. lol
  6. for contractual reasons its not on. basically cause the club got internet rights to it to be able to play it on saintstv
  7. it does my head in. cause i live out of the area I have to pay to listen online when if i lived closer i could turn a radio on and get solent for nothing more than my licence fee which i pay already.
  8. what did you get? Im runnin blind here dammit!!!
  9. not on the internet during the match cause of fecking saints tv. W@nk I tell thee
  10. not all of us are hearing And not many updates on here. I guess there are more actually at SMS tonight
  11. any radio links?
  12. Pearce will make the bench ahead of someone and my guess is wooton.
  13. I would probably drop Perry and bring in Pearce based on how well Cork is playing latly. But after the reading match I would stick with Perry and Cork. If we can get a goal in front then we should be fine. Although the team could do with learning how to close a game out a little more comfortably.
  14. It wont get the fans to fill the stadium though which IMO was the only way we can help keep some of our players. My honest opinion is its too late for that to help now so even with a couple of good performances and results the gates wont increase enough to make the bank think again.
  15. I know what your saying is more likly to be the case. Just wondering if we can shift the high earners and bring the gate reciepts up by xmas if that would give us any room to hold on to a few till the end of the season. If the bank strip us of all our tallent then we will be certain for the bottom 3 and as such administration. the bank wont get as much money out of us should we go that route.
  16. I think if we can get rid of even half of those then the banks might support us refusing offers on Lallana, Surman and Morgan. The bank will know that we need a team to compete and they also know that the further up the table we are the more revenue we will get. The support will go when we have a team that on paper should put us in the play-offs but on the pitch leaves us in a relegation battle. So losing John, Rasiak, Thomas and Saga and a decent pull away from the drop zone between now and xmas might give us the breathing space we need this year. Sumer will be tough to go through though.
  17. Its difficult to go through and pin blame on each person for exact things over the years. much easier to just blame Lowe for the whole lot. And there is loads on all of the threads that twist fact's and rumours to sensationalize things to suit there needs
  18. the same could be said about the stay away fans. Its wrong that we still have Lowe back at the club and its wrong for supporters to deliberatly stay away from match days starving the club of cash it desperatly needs.
  19. dont get many of there lot in torquay but i used to work in plym the season we got relegated and was the brunt of there humour for a long time. so 3 points tomorrow will see me sending out a few emails after the match
  20. While we have Lowe at the club there will always be this kind of reaction though. Anything good that happens will be judged as some kind of conspiricy and anything bad will be used to beat the board with. I was talking to my dad at the weekend about something Le Tiss said on SSN. He was asked why Sturrock never got a real chance at SMS. Le Tiss said he thinks the pressure of the prem got to him and it was a shame. He was asked straight if it was a clash with Rupes and he said it wasnt and that Rupes still talks very highly of Sturrock. My ole man imediatly suggested that Le Tiss wont say anything out of order on TV in case he ends up having to work with the person he might be offending. Saying that He wont upset Rupes in case he finds himself in a position where rupes might be able to help him out. I let him rant and rave for a bit then asked him what if its Sturrock who he has to go cap in hamd too? The guy who he has just said cant hack the big time. Whats the chances of Sturrock helping out Le Tiss when he has just slated him on SNN? I know allot of that is hypothetical but it shows that my dad and many other people that cant stand Lowe hear something and choose it to mean what ever they want. If Le Tiss said that Rupes is he best man for the job my dad would say he was being sarcastic and was winding everyone up. If he said he a tosser my dad would go round telling people he is a tosser and back it up with the fact that Le tiss said so. Most logic is flawed on here.
  21. Which is a huge reason not to like Lowe. the guy cant admit when he gets something wrong. I will never say he is blamless in any of this and that statement was quite laughable how this whole sorry mess is firmly pinned on everyone but himself. But all of that doesnt take away from the facts that horrible decissions have to be made to keep us afloat and the only good thing about having rupes here is that no matter who he blames things on he still has the balls to make those horrible decissions rather than saying there is nothing wrong while the bank eat us up and spit us out. not entirely sure if being a PLC is good bad or indifferent. I dont like the idea of nice little divedends paid out here and there when this money could be spent on the team but on the other hand the divedends dont get paid out unless we are doing well as a club. the better we do the better the divedends so it is in rupes interest for the team to do well as that is the only real way the shareholders will continue to get there nice little brown envelopes.
  22. There wont be many that can disagree with that.
  23. which is still better than the lowest form of life.............. a pompy fan
  24. Considering my post was sarcasm I would say they are both right.
  25. Its actually quite worrying that Dyer hasnt impressed up there. The thought of having him back and no better than when he left to replace lallana is terrifying. Anyone know why he is not getting a game up there? Attitude or ability?
×
×
  • Create New...