Saint Without a Halo

1-1 sinclair

Hoskins, Chambers and Reeves have looked better so on that basis they should all be in the 1st team too!

Nigal was never any good but Nigel is a different story

We already know what a different manager every year leads to! Adkins needs time and he will come good as does the team keep him ffs

Guly does not have a must play when fit clause! and by the way he played reasonably well under the circumstances!

Jose 2 Jos -2 What if anything did we learn from Man U Why take of Lambert and Puncheon who were our only players capable of holding it up front The defence needs a complete re think we panick evey time the ball is in the area and we cannot close down up and down the pitch for 90 mins! when we stop hasseling the pressure comes on and we fall apart every time!

Jose 2 Jos -2 What if anything did we learn from Man U Why take of Lambert and Puncheon who were our only players capable of holding it up front The defence needs a complete re think we panick evey time the ball is in the area and we cannot close down up and down the pitch for 90 mins! when we stop hasseling the pressure comes on and we fall apart every time!

our centre backs are good at scoring in both goals

we do this every game cant hold on to anything

We are going deeper and deeper there we go Hoiveld ffs

Ricky was told to do a job in midfield and probably was only ever going to get 70 mins!

it is obvious now our defence is not up to it therefrore we need to play further up the pitch every time we go defensive we get punished

Well we are not looking the part at present

Now all Fulham Chaplow as a winger and no Lambert we need to be strong

As usual safety first going deeper and we **** up

Bloody hooieveld again

Guly coming on

Our defence is is certainly the keystone kops all running about aimlessly

Lambert will be knackered given his efforts in midfield

Chaplow on for Punch are we going deeper a bit worrying if so!

our mad five minutes coming up? Gazza great save

Lambert dropping back into midfield with Rodriquez up front?

plus hopefully Vas Te still out against us!

Every successful business rises money to invest for future profit/success the issue to understand is does the risk taken match the probability of reward in the case of betting the kitchen sink on promotion it certainly didint here we would need to understand the amount borrowed, the terms of the loan and the criteria and probability for success to understand if it makes good business sense as the saying goes to be a winner you need to take part not being in the race to avoid the risk of falling over or losing cannot produce a winner

A loan to pay for our transfers is sensible as we want them at the front of the season and the revenue comes over the season. Also if we go down we sell the likes of Ramierez to pay off the debt as I doubt he and some others will want to play championship football. where is the problem? If we bought no one, would that have been better SFC is afterall a business and businesses invest for future growth if they are to prosper All investments contain risk the trick is balancing risk with reward!