Sir Ralph
Subscribed Users-
Posts
1,652 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Sir Ralph
-
Not going - they don’t deserve my support. It’s like an abusive relationship where you keep giving but give nothing back until….enough
-
Poor blokes got mugged off by a couple of chancers
-
Does this club deserve your support and money?
Sir Ralph replied to Saint Billy's topic in The Saints
Stop going. I’m not. Preston should be a boycott -
Crap owners, crap manager, lazy players. I just don’t care anymore
-
Boycott
-
What a fucking embarrassment this football club is. Joke I hope the fans give them pelters at the end
-
He needs to go now. This performance is worse than Bristol. Get rid
-
Finn Azaz - very poor performance
-
.
-
.
-
Well I’m a trans women so my view does hold weight and only biological women should use women’s toilets 😆
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Not really- I can see the positive things in people that I don’t agree with and acknowledge it. Don’t have a problem admitting it because experience tells you that everyone has good and bad attributes, just at different levels. You should try it. You can admit people who you don’t agree with can be right - it’s ok -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Very good 🤣 -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
. -
Ok I agree the Tories are hypocrites - they could have done this inquiry and their criticism holds little weight. I dont think Labour ever wanted this Inquiry, hence the original vote to not do it. If you were a victim of abuse, surely you want justice and to stop abuse over anything else, rather than make a political point. To me, its more likely that those in power (this isnt just the Labour Government but includes them) dont want to confront the nasties that are going to be exposed, having been forced politically to do this inquiry in the first instance. There are a lot of people who are going to come out of this very badly, a bit like the epstein case which clearly has elements of cover up. I can imagine a lot of pressure from various quarters to dilute it.
-
heres some evidence in the news the same day you posted. If you have a daughter or wife I assume you would be ok with this? I'm surprised that allegedly rationale people defend men in womens toilets. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cge51zwz384o
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Thats fine but to say people would prioritise political positions over addressing the sexual abuse, when you have been horrendously abused, is very, very unlikely. Your priority would be to stop the abuse of others and see justice, not make a political point. It see it much more likely that there actually issues with the set up of the Inquiry. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
@tdmickey3 looking forward to your response to my question yesterday and your thoughts on the above. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
So the victims have politicised this? Maybe they arent party political (most likely - they arent members of political parties) and I think its more likely they have seen an issue -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Oh dear..... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyvy4q82l9o https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg1xje9wzlo -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly285e5ljyo Another mess. They seem to want to mess up on easy things that they dont need to attract heat on. It wouldnt surprise me if there were alternative reasons for expanding the inquiry as all politicians seemed to have wanted to brush the ethnicity and religious element of these crimes under the carpet. I understand the victims stance - if there has been a cover up for years by authorities why wouldnt they be suspicious of ongoing attempts to reduce the impact of an inquiry. To reiterate, the Tories could have dealt with this issue too and Labour are only doing this, not cause they want to, but because of the heat they have received over it from Rupert Lowe and Reform -
Damion Downs - Official: Loaned to Hamburg
Sir Ralph replied to Matthew Le God's topic in The Saints
If he was just not very good but putting the effort in I could accept that. He isn’t running, jumping, tackling or moving. So you can feel bad that people are booing him but maybe he should try a bit harder. I can think of plenty of average players (eg Omerod) that just worked hard and were loved by the fans. To get through bad patches you need hard work but if he isn’t willing to do that then he’s going to remain pony and people will keep judging. It’s football. start putting some effort in and things might change -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Thanks I’m blushing 🤣 -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Or a massive wave machine on the south coast? -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Holding centre in the countryside for a significant period if they return. Who wants to spend a year or so sat in a holding centre in Gloucester when you could be free in France. Again it’s about disincentivising
