Sir Ralph

Agree on keeper and No 9 but he has a very good midfield and centre backs.

I was optimistic when he joined. Less so now. This week is a big week as he’s had time with most players over the break. He needs to pick up a minimum of 4 points from next three (being generous) but should be 6.

I’m obviously not the only one that thinks it am I? I hadn’t even seen this post till now. Just look at the page about and the constant barrage within the week he has helped achieve this ceasefire. If you can’t see that then I can’t help. For the record I’ve never said whether I agree or otherwise with Trumps policies and I wasn’t the one calling anyone a c&@£. What I have noticed is when someone challenges the Starmer “stronghold” the likely suspects all jump to attention and start back scratching (or worse) each other. It’s sweet but a bit weird from fully grown men.

I said some posters on here will go into meltdown, I didn’t mention you or anyone else or the looney left. You seem to have taken this to heart. Have a good evening

What I’m saying is that generally when someone has done something good, regardless of whether you like them or not, most people would have a degree of respect for that person and at least lay of the criticism for a while. If Starmer sorted out Ukraine, I think the guy is useless, but I would recognise his work in that instance and say fair play. I’d probably have the wherewithal to not start banging on about how crap he is over the following days and weeks. Some posters on here seem determined just to keep having a pop.

That’s brilliant - you’ve told me that if I generalise I’m a simpleton but you’ve done just that. You forgot the full stop by the way 🤣

I just go on what people posts and quite a number of people seems to want to use the Gaza solution to have a go at Trump. To be fair your posts have been reasonable on this matter.

I am too but if you look at most of the posts on this page doesn’t actually do what you say. They have launched into a multitude of various criticisms of Trump, so what you have said isn’t accurate actually. Just look at the posts on this page today.

If (a big if) Trump sorts out Ukraine this place is going to go into meltdown. It’s going to be funny as hell. You lot are getting angry cause he’s actually solving a major world issue. This is classic .😅

I’ve got good links at the club and the scouting team are looking at this guy seriously. Bags of potential https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guido_Carrillo

Yes exactly, so the legal interpretation of the Second Amendment is that it covers self defence so what I said was correct.

There is case law on the Second Amendment that says otherwise (Chat GPT never cross references case law 😉). If you look up District of Columbia v Heller (2008). It’s sort of by the by with regards to the point about Kirk anyway

Yes he did - you quoted that bit correctly. In the UK that would seem to be an unusual statement and in parts of the US people may disagree with it. In other parts it wouldn’t be as the Second Amendment is seen as sacred for various reasons, including to protect life and property. Again, of all the hours of videos debating sensitive and controversial subjects, this is all people ever quote but there are lots of videos of him respectfully debating people and actually being empathetic to this with different views. Hence why I fail to see why anyone would say he is a nasty piece of work or stupid as the evidence doesn’t stack. Seems to me that politically people disagree with his standpoint and therefore are looking to throw mud

@JohnnyShearer2.0 here you go. I may have jumped the gun assuming your view so apologies. This was the start of it. I’m employed so didn’t go through the full list. However the point being that I couldn’t find a single quote which was actually said or was taken completely out of context

Not really - my view is he didn’t say anything really bad. You seem to think he did. I can’t prove a negative. You provide a quote where he said something bad and let’s see the context. As they say - innocent until proven guilty or maybe you don’t take that approach? If he was such a disgusting human being I’m sure you will have multiple quotes or videos to show I’m incorrect so be my guest

He didn’t say that actually - he says we should an honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence. He then said the Americans won’t leave in a utopian society with no gun deaths. So again, facts are important not making things up

Fair enough. I suspect they haven’t actually listened to his stuff. When he died there was a list of all his terrible statements that he had made that got debunked one by one. Essentially they were either made up or out of context

What did he actually say that was controversial though? I see people saying this but they have googled it or read some politically biased article. When you watch any of his videos he says anything but that 99.9% of the time. Seems like a right dick in this -

Of all the hours of videos this is the only one that ever gets quoted. You haven’t probably even watched that video. He actually talks about reducing gun provision. Anyway you were factually incorrect in what you said then so well done on shifting your position. I’ve provided the link for that video as I suspect you haven’t watched it but have a view regardless:

Factually incorrect unfortunately for you. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/charlie-kirk-shot-gun-violence-video-utah-b2825263.html

No I didn’t but Trump plays to the audience he is in front of. I don’t really care what he said. You are focusing on an incredibly minor matter when the key point he had a major role in unlocking this complex conflict which you should be giving him credit for. It’s bizarre you saying he is an embarrassment when he has just achieved this.

He may have made what you perceive to be an uneducated comment in that instance that doesn’t make him stupid. I suspect he was smarter than you or I. Just because you don’t agree with someone they can still be smarter than you

Thanks for your help with that one. There are multiple differences between someone who can articulate a considered point in debate in discussion with somebody with an opposing view (even if you disagree with it) and a maniac on a one-way rant on tik-tok.

You're really scratching with this - desperate times.....