Farmer Saint

Email? You don't even understand online communication. Have never said there weren't inefficiencies, and where in my reply did I say that? I have just asked a number of questions into how you would enable something like that considering the current landscape? The rest of your post is lies and supposition. It's fine, you think that role to role public sector pay is higher than private - it's not and private is substantially higher, even the example I gave yesterday showed that (which was the first one I could find). Tbh if we agreed on things I would be worried, as you are consistently wrong. I don't care if you believe me or not.

No, you said that the public sector paid more than the private sector, and then posted an average wage graph to prove it, with the caption "Here is mine. Public sector wages are higher than private and they get a better deal. Great deal for the tax payer". You were just showing, again, that you just don't know what you're talking about. In relation to the above points, what percentage of staff do you think are inefficient in public services (IE that you'd get rid of)? Is this across all departments (NHS, MOD etc)? If you're removing that percentage, do you expect the remaining people to pick up the slack or do you think you'll need to bring in agency workers to flex resourcing? Would you reduce pensions for people already in role, or would it just be for new starters? How would you bridge that gap?

No, you said that the public sector paid more than the private sector, and then posted an average wage graph to prove it, with the caption "Here is mine. Public sector wages are higher than private and they get a better deal. Great deal for the tax payer". You were just showing, again, that you just don't know what you're talking about. In relation to the above points, what percentage of staff do you think are inefficient in public services? Is this across all departments (NHS, MOD etc)?

Well yes, as I put in my policies it's something I'd remove - it's not a new idea though? I was saying that because @Saint Fan CaM was saying he though Labour was against pensioners and so he was considering voting Reform - this is the most anti-pensioner policy there is.

I'd prefer Carrick to tbh. I put O'Neil at Gerrard's level, like a Poyet - a former footballer who should never have got a job.

I reject him because he's a shit manager who plays shitter football. RM is a far better Manager with far more exciting and expansive football, and I don't want him back.

Be careful... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15258175/Reforms-Richard-Tice-warns-triple-lock-unsustainable.html Unlikely to tax the wealthy either.

And his football is utterly monotonous.

Should move to the public sector, you'll get paid more and a better pension.

Those flats don't rent themselves out...

Brendan Rogers would be my choice if we could attract him.

So you think we should be going after the wealthiest in society? Do you think we should have the triple lock? I assume you're thinking Conservative again then, as Reform are likely to hit pensioners too judging by Tice's interview on LBC the other night.

I genuinely don't understand what they are arguing. Are they advocating more pay for some, less pay for others, higher pension for some, lower pension for others? Considering that SR thinks that public servants get paid more than their private equivalents the arguments don't stack up. I just don't get it.

I think it's a fairly easy rule of thumb in general. I have posted the first example I could find below in the industry I was in until 2014. I would expect it to be similar elsewhere. Lower paid jobs tend to be closer due to minimum wage ensuring a more level playing field. When you get to director level the pay is far outside the 50%.

Just a very quick example near me:

What email? So I say that get paid 50% more in the private sector Vs public. You post a graph showing, in your eyes and post, that public sector people get paid more than private sector. For that, you're either an idiot, or you are young and not aware. You've already said you're not young.

You posted another article which you didn't understand - if you are the age you purport to be then you would know that equivalent roles tend to be much poorer paid in the public sector. It's basics. Otherwise we'd all be working there wouldn't we?

I think it's fair to think that someone on £50k in the public sector will be on £75k in the private sector. It was certainly true in IT back in the mid 10's. I am also comparing London wages TBF.

OMFG, you're such a fucking idiot. That's not comparing role to role, that's averaging every role.

Unsure what you're attempting to prove with this?

That's a fools errand doing that. Public sector pay is at least 50% less than private. If you increase pay and decrease pensions then your bill is going up substantially in the short to medium term. How do you fund that? Higher taxes?

Someone like Juric then?

That will be trotted out a lot I fear.

Fucking love Gary O'No 😂😂😂

How many games until you throw your toys out the pram and come up with some hilarious meme 😂 I'm going 6.