Well. Many people thought Formula One would fall apart without the likes of Lotus, Brabham, Tyrrell, Alfa Romeo and BRM (Going back a bit). The Nineties proved otherwise.
Removing Ferrari would be something I'm willing to try.
The only player with any real first team experience there is Drew Surman. And yes, I havn't mentioned Skacel because I sincerely doubt he will ever play in our first team again.
We have a problem at left back. Ian Harte is a left back with premiership and La Liga experience. He may be slow but it is his natural position. We should be giving him a chance if true.
And C*ntflap senior managing. I watched the Masters football on Sky instead. Wolves won, excellent entertainment. Paul Jones was in goal for them and was excellent.
A point highlighted on Planet F1. No-one battered an eyelid when Kimi overtook Lewis whilst avoiding the recovering Williams UNDER YELLOW FLAGS.
I hate F1 at the moment.
They argument is I believe that Lewis still had better momentum out of the corner. Thus not really surrendering his advantage when he allowed Kimi to overtake back on the straight. However, it just looked to me like the Ferarri had crap traction and that the McLaren simply outperformed Kimi on the way into la Source.
Should be an ideal result for Lewis if things stay as they are. Raikkonen wins, him second, massa third. Ferrari still won't know who to throw their weight behind and Lewis extends his championship lead by another 2 points. Giving him nearly a race in hand should things go badly.
I really don't know. I just thought that the reaction may be because it is Dyer, rather then the notion that someone who really doesn't need to take advantage of anything like this did. Just testing the water.