Ironic, because Corbyn was the biggest chance of any meaningful change for the generation. Probably not have that choice again in a generation, unless Farage ends up leading a violent coup of some sort.
I dont think its even slighlty paranoid to suggest that the billionaire egomaniac owner has been running a strong anti-corbyn, and before that anti-milliband campaign for years, and that the primary reason is his own sense that he might lose power, money and influence if those politicians came to power.
The large amount of people I meet who just recite the headlines from the Sun and Mail is scary and a tad depressing.
They have played the campaign as a straight May vs Corbyn. Then realising the continual smears weren't working anymore on Corbyn they switched to Abbott.
Can't believe the analysis of the Abbott emails on here. How about analysing the lies of the Mail and S*n splashed across their front pages today in a last ditch smear attempt.
I'm also perfectly aware that the media spending all day talking about Abbott is a new front of attack on Corbyn. He's shrugged off their bias so they've moved onto a perceived easier target.
BBC bias. The Tory election broadcasts, every hour, on the hour.
I've never said I don't want Dianne Abbott. I don't know enough about her, but if she gets up Batman's nose she can't be all bad.
Policies not Personalities.
As I said, I was just saying. People are calling on Corbyn to dump Abbott. To do so 2 days before the election would show weak leadership. He has implied by his comments he is taking the people's concerns seriously.
Don't vote Tory.
Just saying, but on Peston on Sunday Corbyn said Abbott was his spokes person on the issue but the cabinet and Home Sec would be decided after and if he won.